Avatar feed
Responses: 3
Sgt Print Journalist
4
4
0
Edited 2 y ago
“(Barr) told the committee he hadn’t seen any evidence of voter fraud on a scale that could have affected the outcome of the presidential election.” Interesting, as there were hundreds of eyewitnesses to 2020 election fraud who signed affidavits after the election. Just because the courts wouldn’t take the cases, doesn’t mean there wasn’t hard evidence. Then, 2000 Mules.
The big question to me, is, who “got” to Barr?
(4)
Comment
(0)
SGT Steve McFarland
SGT Steve McFarland
2 y
Barr has always been a squirrel. He goes with whatever will keep buttering his bread.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Nancy Greene
2
2
0
Why is no one mentioning the woman in Arizona who was convicted of ballot harvesting and is serving time in Federal prison...
(2)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSgt Steve Sweeney
2 y
Perhaps because that case was related to the 2020 Democrat Primary election.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Steve Sweeney
1
1
0
Edited 2 y ago
Strange how D’Souza's so-called "evidence" never stands up in court or any actual legal standard of evidence. But I suppose dim witted Trump supporters are going to believe whatever they want to believe.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close