Avatar feed
Responses: 3
SGT Unit Supply Specialist
3
3
0
MSgt Steve Sweeney
..."Democracy experts have also pointed to other possible solutions to the growing disconnect between public opinion and government policy. Among them is an expansion of the number of members in the House of Representatives, which the Constitution allows Congress to do — and which it regularly did until the early 20th century. A larger House would create smaller districts, which in turn could reduce the share of uncompetitive districts.

Other scholars favor proposals to limit the Supreme Court’s authority, which the Constitution also allows and which previous presidents and Congresses have done.

In the short term, these proposals would generally help the Democratic Party, because the current threats to majority rule have mostly benefited the Republican Party. In the long term, however, the partisan effects of such changes are less clear.

The history of new states makes this point: In the 1950s, Republicans initially supported making Hawaii a state, because it seemed to lean Republican, while Democrats said that Alaska had to be included, too, also for partisan reasons. Today, Hawaii is a strongly Democratic state, and Alaska is a strongly Republican one. Either way, the fact that both are states has made the country more democratic.

Over the sweep of history, the American government has tended to become more democratic, through women’s suffrage, civil rights laws, the direct election of senators and more. The exceptions, like the post-Reconstruction period, when Black Southerners lost rights, have been rare. The current period is so striking partly because it is one of those exceptions.

“The point is not that American democracy is worse than it was in the past,” Mr. Mounk said. “Throughout American history, the exclusion of minority groups, and African Americans in particular, was much worse than it is now.”

“But the nature of the threat is very different than in the past,” he said.

The makeup of the federal government reflects public opinion less closely than it once did. And the chance of a true constitutional crisis — in which the rightful winner of an election cannot take office — has risen substantially. That combination shows that American democracy has never faced a threat quite like the current one."
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
3
3
0
MSgt Steve Sweeney Great Read! Shared to My Facebook and Twitter Feed.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC David Brown
0
0
0
Give me a break. Democrats from Hillary to Al Gore have denied election results. I remember Bush was selected not elected.. Hillary asks how do you get the most votes and not win? Supreme Court has made a lot of decisions that are not popular or very controversial from school integration, to internment of Japanese, t include Kelo v City of New London. More left wing hysteria.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSgt Steve Sweeney
>1 y
Challenging close election results is far different than denying election results when you didn't get the results you want. Continuing to deny after the matter has been adjudicated legally. Your comment is both disingenuous and wrong.

As for getting the most votes and not winning, Hillary has a point. If that were the case for a republican, all you trolls would be screaming bloody murder. Hillary did receive more votes. More Americans wanted her for president.

You can call it what you like. No one really expects you to own up to your own bad behavior. It is not a quality Trump supporters possess.... nor do many criminals.
(2)
Reply
(0)
LTC David Brown
LTC David Brown
>1 y
Hillary’s claim is bogus because everyone knows how the game is played. It is like the coach f a football team lsaying how did I lose when I scored the most yards run. Your own denials are ludicrous.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSgt Steve Sweeney
>1 y
LTC David Brown - Hillary conceded the day after the election as was her duty to do. You do know what "duty" means, right? Something Trump has yet to do. So of course she knew the rules of the game, but her opining that the rules are stupid is not a denial. There was no denial. The only denial here is coming from your yam colored king to whom you prostrate yourself.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close