Posted on Nov 3, 2022
Detroit Free Press refutes Stephen Colbert's claim Tudor Dixon 'made up' person cited in debate:...
274
4
9
2
2
0
Article Quote: ""Dixon's not the only one worried about this issue. So is this guy she totally made up," Colbert told his viewers."
Colbert is a “lying, dog-faced pony soldier”, not meant in a good or funny way. He is a liar plain and simple.
Colbert is a “lying, dog-faced pony soldier”, not meant in a good or funny way. He is a liar plain and simple.
Detroit Free Press refutes Stephen Colbert's claim Tudor Dixon 'made up' person cited in debate:...
Posted from foxnews.com
Elections
Celebrities
Islam
Children
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
1
1
0
Well, I for one am shocked that Stephen Colbert, first of his name, defender of the democrat faith would stick his nose in where he hasn't a clue.
(1)
(0)
‘I found content in my school library describing how to have sex to my son.’
That's so generic. He could have simply found a book on human sexual reproduction. Big deal. Nothing to see here, regardless of whether or not he was the person who actually went up to Dixon.
That's so generic. He could have simply found a book on human sexual reproduction. Big deal. Nothing to see here, regardless of whether or not he was the person who actually went up to Dixon.
(0)
(0)
LTC Kevin B.
SFC (Join to see) - And the guy who "stepped forward" is a failed politician who appears to be looking for his 15 minutes of fame. That's the sword you want to fall on?
And, that woman is not a "political opponent" of Colbert. Colbert isn't running for anything. He's a comedian, and comedians poke fun at people and say outlandish things.
And, that woman is not a "political opponent" of Colbert. Colbert isn't running for anything. He's a comedian, and comedians poke fun at people and say outlandish things.
(0)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
LTC Kevin B. - sorry. Even my phone doesn't like porn. It autocorrected to pointing. It explains why you have no problem with porn in schools.
You get to assume that the father was outraged over a simple human reproduction text, I get to assume you prefer people to talk graphically about their sex lives in public. See how that works?
Your assumption is based on attempting to downplay or belittle a concerned parent's concerns. Attempting to justify his elected leaders completely ignoring him when he brought them his concerns.
My assumption is based off your statement here that a concern about porn in schools is "nothing to see here."
Whose assumption is more valid? One based on NO knowledge of the facts - and assigning idiocy and/or extremism to the unknown? Or the one extrapolating from known facts and public statement?
You get to assume that the father was outraged over a simple human reproduction text, I get to assume you prefer people to talk graphically about their sex lives in public. See how that works?
Your assumption is based on attempting to downplay or belittle a concerned parent's concerns. Attempting to justify his elected leaders completely ignoring him when he brought them his concerns.
My assumption is based off your statement here that a concern about porn in schools is "nothing to see here."
Whose assumption is more valid? One based on NO knowledge of the facts - and assigning idiocy and/or extremism to the unknown? Or the one extrapolating from known facts and public statement?
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google