Posted on Nov 21, 2022
Stanford professor who challenged lockdowns and 'scientific clerisy' declares academic freedom...
732
24
16
6
6
0
Article Quote: "Bhattacharya said that soon after the Great Barrington Declaration gained widespread attention, he received death threats, hate mail and questions on where he receives funding, which he noted, "most of my money has come from the NIH for most of my life.""
Heck even here on Rally Point the COVID-19 tag was regularly deleted under the guise of “being political” to stop honest discussion about the topic. How can we have honest conversations about serious topics when Leadership won’t allow the conversation to take place? Is this about Freedom of Speech?
Heck even here on Rally Point the COVID-19 tag was regularly deleted under the guise of “being political” to stop honest discussion about the topic. How can we have honest conversations about serious topics when Leadership won’t allow the conversation to take place? Is this about Freedom of Speech?
Stanford professor who challenged lockdowns and 'scientific clerisy' declares academic freedom...
Posted from foxnews.com
Stanford University
Medicine
University of Oxford
Research
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
3
3
0
I don't think admins on here as leadership as they have their own agendas.
The forced silence regarding all things covid, except for government approved messaging, was and is wrong. This country was harmed, possibly irreparably harmed because of it. I know my kids were with regards to socialization and education.
The forced silence regarding all things covid, except for government approved messaging, was and is wrong. This country was harmed, possibly irreparably harmed because of it. I know my kids were with regards to socialization and education.
(3)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
Our children were hurt because of lockdowns. Everyone knew that at the time. The government would never release the numbers if infections and degrees of illness by age classification to warrant lockdowns AND injecting our children and younger adults with these vaccines where there may be more harm than benefit by age classification. We weren't allowed to discuss this COVID information in a meaningful context because we couldn't reach out to other technical people to talk using the power of the tag to attract honest discussion. I have to sign off mow sir. Thank you for the comments.
(1)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
Sorry for leaving so quickly. I was on KP last night and stayed online too long. :)
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
Thank you for sharing. It is dangerous when experts are forced to toe a certain point of view.
(3)
(0)
LTC Kevin B.
SFC (Join to see) -
Factually true statement: "Academic Freedom" ≠ "Freedom of Speech"
Also a true statement: "Academic Freedom" ≈ "Freedom of Speech"
I'm saying the former, and I don't disagree with the latter.
I understand your perspective, but that's not how the tags are to be used. That approach can be even more easily abused.
Factually true statement: "Academic Freedom" ≠ "Freedom of Speech"
Also a true statement: "Academic Freedom" ≈ "Freedom of Speech"
I'm saying the former, and I don't disagree with the latter.
I understand your perspective, but that's not how the tags are to be used. That approach can be even more easily abused.
(1)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
LTC Kevin B. - This is where I say: I respectively have to agree to disagree with you. I don't believe I ever read where tags apply exclusively to articles posted. Is this what you are saying?
(0)
(0)
LTC Kevin B.
SFC (Join to see) - Basically yes. Tags should reflect the content of the article, not what the poster wants to make the article about.
(2)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
LTC Kevin B. - What is the key word in your statement? "should ". The member may have relevant issues that an article missed, or the base information could be viewed in a different way. You never saw an article that couldn't be improved? :)
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google