5
5
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
..."Whatever the reason, these lasers won’t be fully operational for at least three years, based on planned upgrades for the Virginia-class photonics mast. Also high-energy weapons have had more than a few performance issues, and submarine lasers could fall victim to similar growing pains. For one, atmospheric turbulence at low levels may mean the periscope laser is not as effective as versions mounted higher up on ships. Sea spray and waves also become a bigger obstacle when a weapon is closer to the water’s surface.
But, judging from the amount of work invested over the past nine years, the U.S. Navy believes a laser-armed nuclear submarine will be useful—we'll have to wait and see if they're right."...
..."Whatever the reason, these lasers won’t be fully operational for at least three years, based on planned upgrades for the Virginia-class photonics mast. Also high-energy weapons have had more than a few performance issues, and submarine lasers could fall victim to similar growing pains. For one, atmospheric turbulence at low levels may mean the periscope laser is not as effective as versions mounted higher up on ships. Sea spray and waves also become a bigger obstacle when a weapon is closer to the water’s surface.
But, judging from the amount of work invested over the past nine years, the U.S. Navy believes a laser-armed nuclear submarine will be useful—we'll have to wait and see if they're right."...
(0)
(0)
Read This Next