Avatar feed
Responses: 5
COL Randall C.
8
8
0
If this article ticks you off but another similar one where it was flipped in a Republican's favor* doesn't - you MIGHT be partisan.

If the other article ticks you of but this one doesn't - you MIGHT be partisan.

Personally, I'm ticked off at both because it just goes further to fuel the distrust that 'something' is going on in elections. How can you fully trust a system where mistakes are accepted?

I know ... I know ... it's better than the alternative, but you'd think that in this day and age we can at least come up with a system that accurately counts votes the first time.
===========================================
* https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/12/08/republican-luana-stoltenberg-wins-iowa-seat-after-second-recount/ [login to see] 7/
(8)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
MAJ Byron Oyler
3 y
The most disturbing part of this Sir is how the winning side is always so accepting of how they got there. I have concerns regarding the 2020 Presidential race and should the GOP win the same way in the near future, ANTIFA and BLM will make 6 JAN seem like a MACY's Thanksgiving Day parade. These kind of elections I fear will be the number one way our land sees real ugly violence again.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen Conway
6
6
0
(6)
Comment
(0)
SPC Jon O.
SPC Jon O.
3 y
Amazing how the democrats can crap thousands of votes after the polls close and nothing for the Republicans. Apparently, it's a full proof system for them. If you challenge it your labeled a racist. What a weak stance, but hay, it works.
(6)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col Charlie Brown
5
5
0
These are just too close to call...congrats to the winner...but I am going to avoid Mass...Boston was already on my no visit list
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close