Avatar feed
Responses: 3
Cpl Vic Burk
8
8
0
Lt Col Charlie Brown In my view, if a person is an E-3 for six years there is something wrong with them and why would the Navy want to keep them, seriously! Sorry but I don't think this is a good move. If you haven't made at least E-4 by the time you are in a total of six years you need to go, and that's pushing it.
(8)
Comment
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT Lawrence Cable
>1 y
The Navy promotion system used to make E-4's board, which the Army doesn't do, and their NCO educational system seems to me to be haphazard and disorganized. The Army will promote a decent NCO to E-7 somewhere around that 10 year mark, the Navy averages about 14 to CPO.
Having been around it more since my Son enlisted, I would think that the Navy could greatly improve retention by adopting a realistic operational tempo, develop some decent off ship quarters for those on sea duty and not send ships out without adequate crews to man all the watches.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Trent Klug
LTC Trent Klug
>1 y
I remember the Corps enlisting 'contract Corporals' in the 80s causing quite a few Lance Corporals to have to leave because their MOS's became rank heavy and there were no promotions.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Vic Burk
Cpl Vic Burk
>1 y
LTC Trent Klug - I never heard about that but I could see that happening.
(2)
Reply
(0)
LTC Trent Klug
LTC Trent Klug
>1 y
Cpl Vic Burk They did it for a year or two. It caused havoc and the aviation Marines really suffered the brunt of it.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
COL Randall C.
4
4
0
Well ... you always need a driver in a buffer rodeo and there are always basketballs to be handed out at the gym, and it's cheaper to pay an E3 than it is a GS-7!
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CWO4 Terrence Clark
2
2
0
The glorification of mediocrity continues.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close