Posted on Jan 11, 2023
GOP preemptively strikes down ethics probe into actions of four republicans
644
33
7
12
12
0
Republicans voted to pass a new set of rules that could severely weaken attempts to investigate congressmen accused of wrongdoing, just as the House was weighing up whether to probe GOP lawmakers who defied their January 6 subpoenas.
In a 220-213 vote on Monday, the new GOP-controlled House imposed a series of changes to the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), an independent body set up in 2008 to investigate allegations of misconduct against members of Congress.
Among the changes would be to reintroduce term limits for members of the bipartisan board, which would force the removal of three of four Democrats who are on the panel.
In a 220-213 vote on Monday, the new GOP-controlled House imposed a series of changes to the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), an independent body set up in 2008 to investigate allegations of misconduct against members of Congress.
Among the changes would be to reintroduce term limits for members of the bipartisan board, which would force the removal of three of four Democrats who are on the panel.
GOP preemptively strikes down ethics probe into actions of four republicans
Posted from newsweek.com
Republicans
Ethics
Rules
Investigation
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
6
6
0
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel good day Brother William, always informational and of the most interesting. Thanks for sharing, have a blessed day!
(6)
(0)
6
6
0
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
..."Along with McCarthy, four other GOP lawmakers were subpoenaed by the panel in May 2022 : Jim Jordan of Ohio, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, Andy Biggs of Arizona and Mo Brooks of Alabama.
As Brooks lost his GOP midterm primary and isn't in the 118th Congress, he wasn't considered for a potential investigation by the OCE for refusing to comply with his January 6 subpoena.
Kevin McCarthy
The then-GOP House leader was subpoenaed by the January 6 panel after refusing to voluntarily appear before the select committee to provide information.
The panel sought testimony from McCarthy about the conversations he had with Trump before, during, and after the January 6 attack, and on claims he made that Trump admitted to him that the former president "does have some responsibility" for the insurrection.
Scott Perry
The January 6 panel wanted to speak to the Pennsylvania congressman about his attempts to install a pro-Trump Department of Justice official, Jeffrey Clark, as acting attorney general who would back the former president's false claims of voter fraud in an attempt to overturn the 2020 election results.
Perry is also said to have discussed with Trump conspiracy theories that Dominion voting machines were being used to rig the election.
Jim Jordan
The Ohio congressman was subpoenaed as the panel wanted him to testify about conversations he had with Trump on January 6.
The committee also wanted to speak to Jordan about the meetings he was said to be present at in 2020 and 2021 where plans to overturn the election results were allegedly discussed.
Andy Biggs
The panel accused Biggs of having "participated in meetings to plan various aspects of January 6," including planning the "stop the steal" protests, which took place in Washington D.C. just before the riot at the Capitol took place.
The committee added that Biggs was alleged to have been part of efforts to persuade state officials that the 2020 election had been "stolen" and was also one of several GOP lawmakers who is alleged to have sought a presidential pardon from Trump before he left office.
The OCE has been contacted for comment."
..."Along with McCarthy, four other GOP lawmakers were subpoenaed by the panel in May 2022 : Jim Jordan of Ohio, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, Andy Biggs of Arizona and Mo Brooks of Alabama.
As Brooks lost his GOP midterm primary and isn't in the 118th Congress, he wasn't considered for a potential investigation by the OCE for refusing to comply with his January 6 subpoena.
Kevin McCarthy
The then-GOP House leader was subpoenaed by the January 6 panel after refusing to voluntarily appear before the select committee to provide information.
The panel sought testimony from McCarthy about the conversations he had with Trump before, during, and after the January 6 attack, and on claims he made that Trump admitted to him that the former president "does have some responsibility" for the insurrection.
Scott Perry
The January 6 panel wanted to speak to the Pennsylvania congressman about his attempts to install a pro-Trump Department of Justice official, Jeffrey Clark, as acting attorney general who would back the former president's false claims of voter fraud in an attempt to overturn the 2020 election results.
Perry is also said to have discussed with Trump conspiracy theories that Dominion voting machines were being used to rig the election.
Jim Jordan
The Ohio congressman was subpoenaed as the panel wanted him to testify about conversations he had with Trump on January 6.
The committee also wanted to speak to Jordan about the meetings he was said to be present at in 2020 and 2021 where plans to overturn the election results were allegedly discussed.
Andy Biggs
The panel accused Biggs of having "participated in meetings to plan various aspects of January 6," including planning the "stop the steal" protests, which took place in Washington D.C. just before the riot at the Capitol took place.
The committee added that Biggs was alleged to have been part of efforts to persuade state officials that the 2020 election had been "stolen" and was also one of several GOP lawmakers who is alleged to have sought a presidential pardon from Trump before he left office.
The OCE has been contacted for comment."
(6)
(0)
4
4
0
I could care less about the term limits, but the House should not have regulatory control over an investigative unit designed to ensure its own members act accordingly.
(4)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
U.S. Constitution
Article 1
Section 5
Paragraph 2
"Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, and, with the Concurrence of two-thirds, expel a Member."
Article 1
Section 5
Paragraph 2
"Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, and, with the Concurrence of two-thirds, expel a Member."
(1)
(0)
MSgt Dale Johnson
MSG Stan Hutchison - You are correct that the Constitution has procedures for that, but they based it on men of conscience, and I am sorry I can't at the moment put together a good who should it be.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google