Posted on Jun 10, 2023
Reality Winner says she's "blown away" by details in indictment against Trump
1.97K
347
68
6
6
0
Reality Winner, the former intelligence contractor imprisoned for leaking a top secret report on Russian hacking, said Friday that she was "blown away" by the level of detail in the unsealed indictment against Donald Trump.
Winner became the first person to be prosecuted and then sentenced under the Trump administration for defying the Espionage Act by leaking classified information. Now Trump faces 31 counts of willful retention of national defense information — in violation of the Espionage Act — as well as other counts related to making false statements and conspiring to obstruct justice.
"This is probably one of the most egregious and cut-and-dry cases," Winner, 31, said in a phone interview with NBC News of the allegations that Trump held onto sensitive government documents and attempted to mislead investigators.
Winner became the first person to be prosecuted and then sentenced under the Trump administration for defying the Espionage Act by leaking classified information. Now Trump faces 31 counts of willful retention of national defense information — in violation of the Espionage Act — as well as other counts related to making false statements and conspiring to obstruct justice.
"This is probably one of the most egregious and cut-and-dry cases," Winner, 31, said in a phone interview with NBC News of the allegations that Trump held onto sensitive government documents and attempted to mislead investigators.
Reality Winner says she's "blown away" by details in indictment against Trump
Posted from nbcnews.com
Espionage
Donald Trump
Law
Crime
Intelligence
Posted 11 mo ago
Responses: 7
18
18
0
Come on Chip, you can do better than this! My God - taking a legal opinion from her on what the indictment says? You could of gotten a story from some biased legal talking head from MSNBC to quote. They would at least have a smidge more credibility. What's next? Joy Reid's insightful comments on Einstein's Theory of Relativity?
(18)
(0)
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
SFC John D. I personally don't debate with folks who won't show their name.
(1)
(0)
SFC John D.
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth - You've crossed paths with her many times before - that's SFC Fuerhoff.
(1)
(0)
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
SFC John D. Just blocked her a while back. She came after me with personal attacks and name calling...I bit one time and felt bad about it so I just blocked her and my time on RP has been much better. However, she has mentioned my name in other posts trying to get to me in around about way but I ain't biting. She cannot have a respectful dialogue...I hope one day she finds peace...seems.to.just be angry at everyone and everything.
(1)
(0)
17
16
1
Anyone with 1/2 a brain can see that this is just Biden trying to not let Trump run aginst him in the upcoming election. The Biden crime family has done more agregious things than Trump has even thought of. If anyone is guilty of treason its definately Joe Biden and his crooked family. The problem is that the woke democrat/comunist don't have 1/2 of a brain.
(17)
(1)
LTC Trent Klug
MSG Stan Hutchison You are so predictable at deflecting anything and everything that reflects badly on progressives. Nottice how a spy who reported Intel to his Chinese masters is simply swiped away as nothing of substance. He still spied and reported but Feinstein gets a pass.
Same with Swalwell. He had a sexualrelationship with a spy and he gets a pass. He's compromised, plain and simple.
Clinton got a pass by the Obama DOJ. Her story is well known and you all give her a pass.
Panetta wasn't charged by the Obama administration. They even used the CIA IG to cover his 'espionage' up in its report. But you're all over Trump for the very same thing.
Holder was never taken to court for the contempt charge. Hmm...wonder why? Oh yeah, he was Obama's wingman.
These are exactly why all the stuff you Crow about Trump is BS. Your side didn't give a rip when they did it, but it's a different story when R's do it.
Your side set the precednt.
Same with Swalwell. He had a sexualrelationship with a spy and he gets a pass. He's compromised, plain and simple.
Clinton got a pass by the Obama DOJ. Her story is well known and you all give her a pass.
Panetta wasn't charged by the Obama administration. They even used the CIA IG to cover his 'espionage' up in its report. But you're all over Trump for the very same thing.
Holder was never taken to court for the contempt charge. Hmm...wonder why? Oh yeah, he was Obama's wingman.
These are exactly why all the stuff you Crow about Trump is BS. Your side didn't give a rip when they did it, but it's a different story when R's do it.
Your side set the precednt.
(3)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
There's no law that stops someone who is charged with or convicted of a felony from running for President nor fulfilling the duty from prison. So how does this stop Trump from running? He can still run. If he won, he could still be President even if he's in prison. I find it extremely f* up that we don't have higher qualifications for people to run for President, VP or Congress but here we are.
I still don't understand how anyone would still want to vote for Trump after everything - he can't properly handle classified material. He was found liable of sexual assault...I just don't get after everything that's come out about him why you want to veot him into office yet again. Do you guys have no morals? Values? Standards? I mean would you be ok if one of your kids brought home a guy like Trump? I sure as hell wouldn't.
I still don't understand how anyone would still want to vote for Trump after everything - he can't properly handle classified material. He was found liable of sexual assault...I just don't get after everything that's come out about him why you want to veot him into office yet again. Do you guys have no morals? Values? Standards? I mean would you be ok if one of your kids brought home a guy like Trump? I sure as hell wouldn't.
(1)
(0)
MSgt (Join to see)
Whoever said the Liberals/Democrats had a brain? A box of rocks are smarter than most of them. :)
(6)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
MSgt (Join to see) - One of many saying I use. My grandchildren use the "Dumber than a box of rocks." statement appropriately when needed.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google