Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SFC John D.
10
10
0
Edited 10 mo ago
6f56e1f0
So let me get this straight. The Left requests that books be restricted to age appropriate reading levels and then complains that they are being reviewed ... sounds like the Christian Communists (the other side of the so-called "Christian Taliban" that some call the right).

The Far-left "book burning" group the Democrats love to embrace but deny the existence of, #DisruptTexts, was behind getting California to place things like To Kill A Mockingbird, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Of Mice and Men, and more of the classics that have been taught for years.
https://spectator.org/disrupttexts-cancel-odyssey/

#DisruptTexts aims to replace great texts with woke-approved ones. And it hides that goal in a slick Trojan Horse. The group claims that it does “not believe in censorship and have never supported banning books.” They get away with it by censorship by omission, a sleight of hand that would make the King of Ithaka clap in approval. For instance, they say: why teach your students The Odyssey? After all, it’s just one more book “centered on the white male gaze” and written by a white male author. And everyone knows that “for too long, the traditional ‘canon’ — at all grade levels — has excluded the voices and rich literary legacies of communities of color.” With Homer and company gone, you can chuck those gross white voices from the classics and substitute a rad suggested text, like Jesmyn Ward’s Salvage the Bones or Jacqueline Woodson’s Another Brooklyn. Texts like these, which “affirm and center BIPOC voices,” are examples of “liberation,” while teaching texts by white male authors “hurts all students, and especially students of color.” But who said anything about censorship!

But they aren't just sticking to affecting the curriculum anymore and are directly going after classics like Milton and Shakespeare and are encouraging their followers (https://twitter.com/hashtag/DisruptTexts) to use whatever means they can to remove these books from our children.

As Jonathan Zimmerman, a self-described liberal who wrote in The Dallas Morning News: “When conservatives try to ban a book, we liberals get up in arms. But when the threat comes from our own side, we often sit on our hands.”

So, Christian Communists, heal thyself.
(10)
Comment
(0)
MSG Civilian Investigator
MSG (Join to see)
10 mo
(5)
Reply
(0)
LTC Trent Klug
LTC Trent Klug
10 mo
SFC John D. MSG (Join to see) Funny how this is happening in a democrat stronghold. According to the story I cite below, only four books have been banned, but it's from May of this year.

https://www.orlandoweekly.com/news/orange-county-school-board-reluctantly-approves-book-ban-policies-with-hands-tied-by-the-state-34179950
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col Charlie Brown
6
6
0
Review doesn't mean removed. And books have appropriate ages...that's why libraries have children's sections and children's library cards or has that changed as well?
(6)
Comment
(0)
SFC John D.
SFC John D.
10 mo
I think a good standard is what one of the parents suggested when Biden was criticizing "Book Banning". If you can real-aloud and show the pictures in the book to your granddaughter, then I'll withdraw any objection I have to the book.

Full disclosure, both sides submit books for review. But a Conservative on the Right wants to have a book reviewed for appropriateness because of the sexually explicit content or images. A Progressive on the Left wants to have a book reviewed because it doesn't fit their ideology.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC David Brown
1
1
0
Funny I don’t see those on the left that get there boxers in a bunch about so-called book bans objecting to rewriting books. Willie Wanka, James Bond and a bunch other are being rewritten with the purpose of avoiding offending readers
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close