Posted on Aug 18, 2023
Retirees Could See $17,400 Reduction in Benefits by 2033: Analysis
504
12
6
6
6
0
Posted in these groups: Social Security Administration
Benefits
Benefits
Posted 10 mo ago
Responses: 4
3
3
0
As I see all the Federal local grants being announce for noncritical infrastructure funded by the Inflation Reduction Act… why an I not surprised. Anyone who voted for politicians who enacted the Inflation Reduction Act voted to reduce their future Social Security Benefits.
Why didn’t the politicians who borrowed this money explain how it was going to affect your benefits.
Why is this government site directed to by this link in Tik Tok? Our Country is in trouble.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/117-2022/h420
Why didn’t the politicians who borrowed this money explain how it was going to affect your benefits.
Why is this government site directed to by this link in Tik Tok? Our Country is in trouble.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/117-2022/h420
H.R. 5376: Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 -- House Vote #420 -- Aug 12, 2022
H.R. 5376 was originally introduced as the Build Back Better Act, President Biden's signature legislative proposal in 2021, but after the bill failed to gain enough support in the Senate …
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
The government had better get their act together on this. Too many folks rely on thinking social security will be there for them.
(2)
(0)
1
1
0
So sad that the right (and Epoch Times is a newsletter for the far right) has taken such a hard pivot to fear. Fear is what the left uses to push through authoritarian measures and keep the masses in line. We saw it in covid, we see it with climate change.
"Could see" is the tipoff here.... If the worst possible thing happens - not just one thing but ALL the things - this is how bad it could get. That type of thinking is great for strategic planners and risk managers - identify all of the potential problems and worst case scenarios so you can mitigate and prevent. But that type of thinking is HORRIBLE for legislators or the public. And it is ridiculously irresponsible for the media.
"Could see" is the tipoff here.... If the worst possible thing happens - not just one thing but ALL the things - this is how bad it could get. That type of thinking is great for strategic planners and risk managers - identify all of the potential problems and worst case scenarios so you can mitigate and prevent. But that type of thinking is HORRIBLE for legislators or the public. And it is ridiculously irresponsible for the media.
(1)
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
Almost as irresponsible as saying that Jan. 6 was the biggest threat to our government since Pearl Harbor or the Civil War. Talk about hyperbole . . .
(0)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D. I agree. The Epoch Times is almost as irresponsible as the far left.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google