Posted on Oct 26, 2023
Ivanka Trump hit with motion to force her to testify in dad’s fraud trial
291
10
2
5
5
0
New York Attorney General Letitia James on Thursday filed motions stating that Ivanka Trump should be compelled to testify in her father's $250 million fraud trial.
The attorney general sought Trump's testimony even though she was dismissed from the case.
Last week, Donald Trump's daughter filed papers with the New York Supreme Court arguing that she did not have to testify because subpoenas had not been properly served.
The attorney general sought Trump's testimony even though she was dismissed from the case.
Last week, Donald Trump's daughter filed papers with the New York Supreme Court arguing that she did not have to testify because subpoenas had not been properly served.
Ivanka Trump hit with motion to force her to testify in dad’s fraud trial
Posted from rawstory.com
State of New York
Donald Trump
Fraud
Posted 6 mo ago
Responses: 2
3
3
0
Ivanka Trump Trying To Weasel Out Of Testifying Against Her Family
Ivanka Trump is terrified about the thought of having to testify against her father and brothers that her lawyers have filed a flimsy and almost laughable mo...
YouTuber analysis of the Raw Story article about why her lawyers arguments (subpoena, deposition, jurisdiction) don't hold up as valid reasons. Since she is considered a witness instead of a defendant, refusing to testify can mean contempt of court.
https://youtu.be/GL0OIfF1690?si=aW8EX4yc1BEhrL0G
https://youtu.be/GL0OIfF1690?si=aW8EX4yc1BEhrL0G
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
...""The NYAG, which never deposed Ms. Trump, is effectively trying to force her back into this case from which she was dismissed by a unanimous decision of the Appellate Division, First Department," her legal team wrote. "Ms. Trump is not a party in this action. Nor is Ms. Trump a New York resident. It is black-letter law that, given those two facts, Ms. Trump is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court."
In a filing on Thursday, James disputed the arguments.
"Ms. Trump was served properly at the New York addresses and actual place of business of multiple entities that are under her control; she should be compelled to testify in this proceeding," James wrote. "But even beyond that, Ms. Trump remains financially and professionally intertwined with the Trump Organization and other Defendants and can be called as a person still under their control."...
...""The NYAG, which never deposed Ms. Trump, is effectively trying to force her back into this case from which she was dismissed by a unanimous decision of the Appellate Division, First Department," her legal team wrote. "Ms. Trump is not a party in this action. Nor is Ms. Trump a New York resident. It is black-letter law that, given those two facts, Ms. Trump is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court."
In a filing on Thursday, James disputed the arguments.
"Ms. Trump was served properly at the New York addresses and actual place of business of multiple entities that are under her control; she should be compelled to testify in this proceeding," James wrote. "But even beyond that, Ms. Trump remains financially and professionally intertwined with the Trump Organization and other Defendants and can be called as a person still under their control."...
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google