Avatar feed
Responses: 9
CSM Michael J. Uhlig
5
5
0
No problem with the decision however, I'd like to see them go through additional weapons training to including verification of current qualification.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Management
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
CSM Michael J. Uhlig I am sitting here in my office (yes Im still at work) reading thru the WHOLE policy that just hit my end box. It is a very well thought out and put together.

The key to this from what Im reading so far is that it is NOT mandatory, but optional for the Soldiers. Now with that being said there are alot of checks and balances.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CSM Michael J. Uhlig
CSM Michael J. Uhlig
>1 y
I'd be interested in knowing more about the policy SFC (Join to see) however, if it's FOUO, don't share the info on public source...probably best not to share the TTPs on public at all.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Management
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
No problem CSM. I'll look thru it more in depth and see if I can pull some highlights. It's been on the news already tonight so I don't think it's too "classified". Lol
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Desk Officer
4
4
0
Good for him! Maybe Tennessee will lead the nation on this issue.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen C.
3
3
0
Fine by me, SFC (Join to see)!
(3)
Comment
(0)
SPC George Rudenko
SPC George Rudenko
>1 y
Liability disaster waiting to happen.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close