Adult film star Stormy Daniels testifies against Trump in New York trial

PO1 William "Chip" Nagel While Merchan denied the defense's motion for mistrial, he did agree "there were things that were better left unsaid" during Daniels' testimony.

It is my understanding that Stormy’s testimony was salacious, and out side the rules for evidence. I am not a lawyer but that seems to be the opinion of many I listened to. Stormy’s testimony was prejudicial against Trump. It is my understanding that a rape case against Harvey Weinstein was overturned because of testimony like Stormy’s. Stormy signed two letters that said she never had a sexual encounter with Trump and stated the same in interviews. Despite the record of inconsistencies Merchan said Stormy’s testimony was credible. Stormy admitted she owed Trump money but said she wasn’t going to pay him. The money owed is a court judgement. If she will defy a court ordered judgement why does an oath to truth bind her especially since she says she hates Trump? Here is a different take on Stormy’s court appearance. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/da-bragg-stormy-daniels-save-trump-case-something-happened