The Reasons Young Women Embrace the Left Do Not Reflect Well on These Women

No it does not. The government has become a replacement "daddy" in more than one sense of the word.

Interesting opinion. Me? I think it's because it's been the indoctrination pattern since the 1990's. Everything feminine is good, masculinity bad. Who are a large part of conservatives? Men. So naturally women are taught to go the other way.

Personally, I wouldn't date any metropolitan gal in the 20 to 35 year old range today at all. Even if I were the same age as them. I'd be searching the farms and ranches for a lady with common sense and the ability to care for herself.

I think Prager misses the mark here. And misses it bigly.

From what I have seen and heard, women turning to Clinton / Biden / Harris because Trump called Clinton a nasty woman or bragged about sexual assault is not about this making them liberal. It is about this making them anti-Trump. And, as a result, they have turned to the only other option provided: Clinton / Biden / Harris.

And it is about Republicans and conservatives in general condoning, if not outright embracing Trump, despite those comments.

It is not about being so weak that one random comment can make you change your values, it is about standing up for values - which includes treating women with respect - and shunning the candidate (and the party) that seems to actively disregard those values and even attack them. Quite frankly, I am STILL perplexed why the Republican party - a party that is SUPPOSED to stand for family values - has so thoroughly embraced a man who bragged about sexual assault. A man who has repeatedly cheated on his wife only to divorce her and marry his mistress. A man who appears to have all of the morals of a polecat - and a drunken one, at that.

And Prager's assertion that Trump calling Clinton a nasty woman just proves that he is embracing feminism and treating her the same as he treats men falls completely flat when you see all of Trump's comments - and not just the Access Hollywood tape - about women, and how he sees pretty much all of them as sex objects - even his own daughter. Trump in no way sees or treats women the same as men. His rhetoric is cruel towards everyone - but even more so toward women.

---

And as to his first point, Prager misses the mark, there, too. There is tremendous value in having your voice - or the voice of someone who shares your culture, values, and experiences - in the room. There is tremendous value in simply BEING heard. And there is tremendous value in SEEING people fill those roles, and demonstrating that people like you CAN do great things.

If your family for 37 generations has been ditch diggers, and everyone you know is a ditch digger and the only people you ever see are ditch diggers, with the VERY rare exception of the seeing the ditch OWNERS, who look nothing like you, it is virtually guaranteed that you will believe that the only thing you CAN be is a ditch digger.

---

Prager usually has some keen insight. Highly biased, but still keen insight. This column is nothing more than rationalizing support for a horrible candidate, horrible President, and all-around horrible human being.