Posted on Sep 14, 2017
A Korean military conflict could mean World War III, says Citi's top political analyst
1K
3
7
1
1
0
IF we back down from war, the worst will be the proliferation threat. nK may be launching to show case their missiles for sale. Iran will be a buyer.
The real hazards will be has I stated in this article: http://inhomelandsecurity.com/worst-case-scenarios-north-korea/
The real hazards will be has I stated in this article: http://inhomelandsecurity.com/worst-case-scenarios-north-korea/
A Korean military conflict could mean World War III, says Citi's top political analyst
Posted from cnbc.comPosted in these groups: 
Geopolitics / International Relations
Korea
North Korea
South Korea
Conflict
Geopolitics / International Relations Korea North Korea South Korea Conflict
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
1
1
0
SSgt GG-15 RET Jim Lint
PFC (Join to see) - If we nuke nK we might not need to take over the country. What do you propose as the best solution, invasion or nukes. Lots of tough questions that leaders have to make.
(0)
(0)
PFC (Join to see)
SSgt GG-15 RET Jim Lint - I don't want to nuke that country because the fall out will effect South Korea and Japan pretty bad.
(0)
(0)
SSgt GG-15 RET Jim Lint
PFC (Join to see) - I agree. But that then calls for an infantry assault. That does not do well for troops.
(1)
(0)
PFC (Join to see)
SSgt GG-15 RET Jim Lint if it came down to military action I would rather do that I will accept that risk and go in if it meant sparing innocent lives in South Korea or Japan. There is no good options but I'd rather take the option where less innocents die.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
We,ve paid hundreds of billions for this THAAD anti missile system, use it
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google