Posted on Jun 9, 2016
Appeals Court Upholds ‘Concealed Carry’ Restrictions
1.79K
13
25
4
4
0
http://www.wsj.com/articles/appeals-court-upholds-concealed-carry-restrictions [login to see] ?mod=trending_now_
Is this going to ruffle some feathers? You bet it will. Starting with me.
Americans have no Second Amendment right to carry concealed guns in public, a federal appeals court in California ruled on Thursday in a significant blow to gun-rights activists and gun owners in a large swath of the Western U.S.
Is this going to ruffle some feathers? You bet it will. Starting with me.
Americans have no Second Amendment right to carry concealed guns in public, a federal appeals court in California ruled on Thursday in a significant blow to gun-rights activists and gun owners in a large swath of the Western U.S.
Appeals Court Upholds ‘Concealed Carry’ Restrictions
Posted from wsj.comPosted in these groups: 
Gun Control
Gun Control
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 11
3
3
0
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/09/court-no-right-to-carry-concealed-weapons-in-public.html?intcmp=hpbt3
This is one of the reasons why I consider myself a California refugee. The liberals on this court are trying to strip our rights away and the focus right not is on the 2nd Amendment. Support the NRA and other gun rights organizations. The fight is now out in the open.
This is one of the reasons why I consider myself a California refugee. The liberals on this court are trying to strip our rights away and the focus right not is on the 2nd Amendment. Support the NRA and other gun rights organizations. The fight is now out in the open.
Appeals court rules Americans don't have right to carry concealed guns | Fox News
A federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled Thursday that people do not have a Second Amendment right to carry concealed weapons in public, in a sweeping decision likely to be challenged by gun-rights advocates.
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
I don't know why it's not argued to be a form as privacy such as a bottle of liquor in a paper bag. Citizens have the right to privacy and against unlawful search and seizure. May not be the end of hearing about it.
(2)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
This is just the beginning of hearing about it. This is nearly as old as the Bible.
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
What nobody can give a reason to hide the gun they carry? No imaginary friends when you were a kid.
All they say you have to write a reason to hide it. What restriction is that??
All they say you have to write a reason to hide it. What restriction is that??
(2)
(0)
MSgt Michael Bischoff
SGT (Join to see) - The decision by an 11-member panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals means counties in California may require individuals to prove they have “good cause” such as a threat to their safety before they are issued a concealed weapons permit.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
That's funny. Sure they all will have cause for protection because of ----. Fill in the blank.
(0)
(0)
SMSgt Thor Merich
Here is the problem. An applicant has to have "good cause" to carry. However, in many counties in California, there is no circumstance where "good cause" would apply. In other words, there is never any "good cause."
I know this is fact in LA County and other Southern California counties. I used to process CCW applications in LA County and our instructions where that all applicants gets rejected. Unless your a judge or a friend of the Sheriff.
The reason that the lawsuit was filed is because very few CCW's were issued. The success rate was less than 01% of all applicants.
I know this is fact in LA County and other Southern California counties. I used to process CCW applications in LA County and our instructions where that all applicants gets rejected. Unless your a judge or a friend of the Sheriff.
The reason that the lawsuit was filed is because very few CCW's were issued. The success rate was less than 01% of all applicants.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google