Archbishop of Canterbury: Accusing Israel of Hospital Attack is ‘Blood Libel’ | Frontpage Mag

Wait! What? There is a sane voice in England? Who knew?

Thank you for this. The Israelis did not attack the hospital. It was the Palestinians own doing.

Wow! That's some typical Horowitz type hate. I've known Stephen Sizer since 1992. His Ph.D. dissertation was on Christian Zionism, which then and now still is a hot topic. He is not antisemitic in any way, shape, or form. He was attacked by the political zionist machine in Britain because apparently he "exposed" secrets. So the poor Arcibishiop no doubt had to fend off political attacks from zionists after the "inquisition" charges the zionists wanted to level insisting it be conducted by the church targeting Sizer. It was determined he was innocent of the foolish charges. Friends worldwide defended him, including numerous Jewish friends and clergy.

And the article is not kind to the Archbishop either who learned a little something form Sizer, who the political zionists wanted to label as "a renegade" but his church did not agree. It is such a bungled propaganda effort it is funny.

Who did not know the hospital that was bombed was going to be used as a propaganda weapon - if ONLY because so much confusion and denial was created about it immediately? Best to avoid traps when possible - kinda like trip wires. Gotta be looking for them.