Responses: 23
PO1 James Booker
I've been in REAL close proximity to those 16" guns pounding away. Let me tell you...it's something to behold. We were only a few hundred yards away watching the Missouri fire a full broadside. Yeah they were old, expensive and of limited strategic value to modern warfare...but there's no denying the raw power. You just don't get the same "chills" down your spine watching a VLS Tomahawk.
(1)
(0)
USS Gabrielle Giffords will yell "bang" really loud.
https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/uss-gabrielle-giffords-really-whose-bright-idea-was-this
https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/uss-gabrielle-giffords-really-whose-bright-idea-was-this
(8)
(0)
It's a GREAT idea. As with any marksmanship discipline the key to accuracy, and more importantly CONFIDENCE of accuracy is rounds down range. You can run all the simulations you like(as with dry-firing for a competitive shooter)...but nothing, NOTHING beats live fire.
I'm quite sure that the caveat "unless for safety, operational or environmental reasons you are not able to fire" will meet with a broad interpretation in the fleet. That being said, I get the gist of the order. It's a REAL bad feeling when going into an INSURV or other inspection...not to mention a real world conflagration.. without 100% confidence in your training, procedures, and hardware.
The "it's going to cost a lot and break our guns" crowd doesn't get it. The techs who work on the systems will inevitably become much more proficient at not only working/fixing...things that break, but will also be more "in tune" and catch potential small issues before they become major repairs.
I'm all for it...
I'm quite sure that the caveat "unless for safety, operational or environmental reasons you are not able to fire" will meet with a broad interpretation in the fleet. That being said, I get the gist of the order. It's a REAL bad feeling when going into an INSURV or other inspection...not to mention a real world conflagration.. without 100% confidence in your training, procedures, and hardware.
The "it's going to cost a lot and break our guns" crowd doesn't get it. The techs who work on the systems will inevitably become much more proficient at not only working/fixing...things that break, but will also be more "in tune" and catch potential small issues before they become major repairs.
I'm all for it...
(5)
(0)
CMDCM Gene Treants
Totally concur PO1 James Booker we need to use our gear if we are going to fix and work it. Weapons systems have always been a scared cow that remained untouchable except for an occasional shoot. I agree that daily exercises will improve our proficiency and ability to maintain.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next