Avatar feed
Responses: 1
SGT Mary G.
1
1
0
Edited 1 y ago
Sounds good, sort of, theoretically only. I remain dubious. There is no convincing explanation about why both ways of containment are considered safe. Are they failsafe and foolproof?
The fact is that the amount of energy input is barely under the amount of energy output, once only as far as we know. That is a problem. Is the miniscule excess of energy enough to power the process? And regardless of how they the process is described, it is a contained thermonuclear process (correct me if I'm wrong). Who needs a miniature sun nearby when the grid dysfunctions and the containment stops working?
As they say "Fusion is the energy of the future — and it always will be."
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close