Avatar feed
Responses: 16
SSgt Geospatial Intelligence
10
10
0
Sounds like PC got her. She was riding the line of being "too direct", but in today's culture, the thin-skin of the next generation seems to be unable to take directness. I think it sounds like she may have crossed the line of being too blunt, but perhaps that is what was needed. Sounds like she has a LOT of supporters & only a few detractors. Of course, when your piers won't buy in to your methods, the knives come out.
(10)
Comment
(0)
LCpl Steven Humphrey
LCpl Steven Humphrey
>1 y
You dont grow without rain and sometime that rain is a public ass chewing. its up to the person to decide weather to take it personal or not. it sucks to see that not many people can learn a positive lesson from an ass chewing.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LCpl Steven Humphrey
LCpl Steven Humphrey
>1 y
yup everyone gets a trophy.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Ken Prescott
Sgt Ken Prescott
>1 y
LCpl Steven Humphrey - Ahem. Praise in public, correct in private. I learned that back in the Old Corps. Publicly chewing out a subordinate just demonstrates that the commander cannot command herself.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LCpl Steven Humphrey
LCpl Steven Humphrey
>1 y
all im saying is that there is those that need it and those that dont. you shoul not hender yourself buy only useing one tool in in your toolbox. every tool has its use and is just as important as the other. no more no less. that being said people take things too personally these days.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Jeremiah B.
7
7
0
Edited >1 y ago
It is entirely possible to get great results and be completely toxic. Short-term gains will be off-set or totally negated by long-term damage. Based on the article, it sounds like she was a mix of good and bad that ultimately led leadership to lose faith in her ability to effectively lead at that level.
(7)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
>1 y
This was my take as well.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Engineer Equipment Chief
MSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
I agree with the toxic comment. However I think instead of exemplifying the females doing the best they could, she sounded condensending by saying if they weren't better then their male counterparts they weren't good enough. So at what point do these females retain hope to be something? By performing at such a high standard with no room to grow, any detriment on their part causes damage beyond repair? Where as a male counterpart only has to perform to his best ability. Physical standards are important, but if a female is performing at a male level, doesn't that make her a male? For many being a woman in the mans club is challenging, for others easy, many are just struggling to be the best THEY can be. Shouldn't that be enough when comparing genders? Yes this was a toxic environment and yes training did improve, but at what cost? To weight the value of a man against a woman? That is the fine line that many people don't want to address... It's okay to acknowledge being female and performing to the best ability possible. But comparing physical attributes is ignorant. Pretty soon the military will have men dressed as women, until their gender reassignment is approved!
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Andrew Nelson
5
5
0
The point was made in the article if she was a man it wouldn't have been a problem. Patton, Puller and loads of other straight talking Generals would be dismayed at what is happening to the military today.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Phil Hsueh
Cpl Phil Hsueh
>1 y
To be honest though, it's not like Patton got away with being the way he was. Remember, after the slapping incident he was given command of a dummy army in England and sat out the Normandy landings. Then after the war in Europe ended they didn't send him to fight in the Pacific, instead they gave him baby sitting duties in Germany.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close