Avatar feed
Responses: 1
COL Randall C.
0
0
0
I'm confused. The EPA and politicians supporting their findings were all over the news just a couple of weeks back telling everyone that there were no lasting environmental hazards (after the contaminated soil is removed), the water was safe to drink, etc.

Now, this may turn out to be nothing and the previous statements could be absolutely true, but the bottom line is there is a lot more that needs to be looked at to be sure.

The EPA said the air was safe to breath after the towers came down ... until it wasn't.
The EPA said the water was safe to drink in Flint, Michigan ... until it wasn't.

Is there any reason that people are skeptical when the government tells you that "our experts have concluded it's all good"?

The EPA does a lot of good, but just like the media, when it says something that doesn't synch with common sense, you need to take a much harder look.

Even a good handyman lives by the adage of, "Measure twice, cut once" (in my case, since I don't claim to be a "good" handyman ... it's measure a half-dozen times and then get someone to recheck my work). So too for situations like these.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close