Posted on Oct 31, 2016
FBI Never Destroyed Laptops Of Clinton Aides says DC Attorney
1.24K
19
9
4
4
0
"Agents within the Federal Bureau of Investigation never destroyed laptops given to them by aides of Hillary Clinton as previously reported, a Washington D.C. lawyer with a source close to the Clinton investigation says.
Washington D.C. attorney Joe DiGenova said on The David Webb Show on SiriusXM Friday night that despite the FBI agreeing to destroy the laptops of Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson as part of immunity deals made during the initial investigation of Clinton’s email server, agents involved in the case refused to destroy the laptops."
Could this be true?
Washington D.C. attorney Joe DiGenova said on The David Webb Show on SiriusXM Friday night that despite the FBI agreeing to destroy the laptops of Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson as part of immunity deals made during the initial investigation of Clinton’s email server, agents involved in the case refused to destroy the laptops."
Could this be true?
FBI Never Destroyed Laptops Of Clinton Aides says DC Attorney
Posted from conservativebyte.comPosted in these groups: 
Election 2016
FBI
Election 2016 FBI
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 5
5
5
0
“‘According to the agreement reached with the attorneys who handed over their laptops, the laptops were to be destroyed per the agreement after the testimony was given –the interviews were given – – by the attorneys. The bureau and the department agreed to that,’ DiGenova said. ‘However the laptops contrary to published reports were not destroyed and the reason is the agents who are tasked with destroying them refused to do so. And by the way the laptops are at the FBI for inspection by Congress or federal courts.’
DiGenova said the laptops have already been subpoenaed and the FBI is waiting for Congress to ask for them."
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/29/dc-attorney-fbi-never-destroyed-laptops-of-clinton-aides/
DiGenova said the laptops have already been subpoenaed and the FBI is waiting for Congress to ask for them."
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/29/dc-attorney-fbi-never-destroyed-laptops-of-clinton-aides/
DC Attorney: FBI Never Destroyed Laptops Of Clinton Aides
Agents within the Federal Bureau of Investigation never destroyed laptops given to them by aides of Hillary Clinton as previously reported, a Washington D.C. lawyer with a source close to the Clinton
(5)
(0)
SSgt GG-15 RET Jim Lint
Also, when doing forensics on computers, you first make a copy to work on. You do not damage the originals. So, if the original is destroyed, the office still has the other copy that they did the searches and investigation on.... :)
(1)
(0)
Capt Seid Waddell
SSgt GG-15 RET Jim Lint, if normal procedures are followed; in this case that is open to question. Everyone involved was granted immunity, no Grand Jury was formed to issue subpoenas to seize evidence so the FBI had to bargain for the cooperation of those under investigation, and Hillary (at least) was interviewed without being places under oath and no transcript was kept.
So the agreement to do only a limited search of the hard drives and then to destroy them afterwards looks more like a cover-up than a real investigation.
The conclusion that highly classified documents had been unlawfully removed from secure locations and places on unauthorized and unsecured drives is all that was necessary for a conviction - the lack of "criminal intent" is not an element in any of the crimes charged.
This looks more like a political whitewash than a real investigation, IMHO.
So the agreement to do only a limited search of the hard drives and then to destroy them afterwards looks more like a cover-up than a real investigation.
The conclusion that highly classified documents had been unlawfully removed from secure locations and places on unauthorized and unsecured drives is all that was necessary for a conviction - the lack of "criminal intent" is not an element in any of the crimes charged.
This looks more like a political whitewash than a real investigation, IMHO.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
2
2
0
Actually I am proud of our bretheran at the FBI who refused to violate their oaths by destroying evidence in a criminal investigation.
(2)
(0)
Capt Seid Waddell
CPT Alan Bentson, it is the same as refusing illegal orders in the military, IMHO.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google