Posted on Nov 21, 2020
Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit
2.54K
33
7
10
10
0
Trump campaign loses yet another bid to stop the election.
The judge sums it up well,
"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," Brann added. "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."
"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more," the judge wrote." At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."
The judge sums it up well,
"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," Brann added. "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."
"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more," the judge wrote." At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."
Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit
Posted from cnn.com
Election 2020
Donald Trump
Joe Biden
Office of the President (POTUS)
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 2
7
7
0
There is no evidence to present. If Trumps lawyers had evidence it would have been presented but it hasn't. They don't have a pot to pass in.
(7)
(0)
2
2
0
I watch a YouTube channel called Via Frei and one with Frei and Barnes. They both contend that you can predict the findings of a judge based on who appointed them and I have watched them enough to know that is statistically true. A bad example being Emmett Sullivan and Gen. Flynn. I could have told you who appointed this judge without looking.
(2)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
Live with Nate & Kurt - Election Stream EXTRAVAGANZA!
Three lawyers talking election stuffs. Kurt, Nate & Viva going over the latest - the lawsuits, the debunked stories, and everything else!
CPT Lawrence Cable I do recall Via Frei now, he's a much of a partisan as anyone else and willing to ... ignore ... facts that are inconvenient.
For example, this video (around 1:16:15) where he is talking about comparing the signatures on the ballots to the signatures on the voter roll, Via Frei is either ignorant of what is on a ballot or really just didn't think things through. One of the foundational parts of our election is once a vote is cast there is no way to tie that back to how a person voted. So in person ballots, mail in ballots, etc; once the person is verified to be a valid voter and the ballot cast, there is no way to tie back the votes on a ballot to a person.
Any checks on a recount to make sure any individual ballot was cast by a valid voter would require a way to tie back the ballot to a specific person, a huge no no. That's why on mail in votes the ballot isn't signed, but instead the envelope and/or privacy screen. Once the signature is verified, the ballot is pulled out and put into the pile of valid ballots with no way to tie it back to who cast it. That's very much by design. Not just in GA, but in every state.
Edit, forgot link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEnFTQwkBuM&t=4589s
For example, this video (around 1:16:15) where he is talking about comparing the signatures on the ballots to the signatures on the voter roll, Via Frei is either ignorant of what is on a ballot or really just didn't think things through. One of the foundational parts of our election is once a vote is cast there is no way to tie that back to how a person voted. So in person ballots, mail in ballots, etc; once the person is verified to be a valid voter and the ballot cast, there is no way to tie back the votes on a ballot to a person.
Any checks on a recount to make sure any individual ballot was cast by a valid voter would require a way to tie back the ballot to a specific person, a huge no no. That's why on mail in votes the ballot isn't signed, but instead the envelope and/or privacy screen. Once the signature is verified, the ballot is pulled out and put into the pile of valid ballots with no way to tie it back to who cast it. That's very much by design. Not just in GA, but in every state.
Edit, forgot link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEnFTQwkBuM&t=4589s
(3)
(0)
(3)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
This judge was appointed by Trump:
https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/judge-dismisses-trump-campaign-lawsuit-seeking-to-halt-georgia-election-certification
https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/judge-dismisses-trump-campaign-lawsuit-seeking-to-halt-georgia-election-certification
Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign lawsuit seeking to halt Georgia election certification
A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed byPresident Donald Trump and his lawyersseeking a temporary restraining order to halt certification of Georgia's election.
(3)
(0)
Suspended Profile
This judge was appointed by Obama on the recommendation of Republican senator Pat Toomey, has run for office as a Republican, has chaired the regional Republican Party, and has been active in Republican causes.
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google