GOP lawmakers blast Trump's 'Morning Joe' tweets

MSG Joseph Cristofaro - Shocking as you continue to justify the shooting of unarmed individuals that are in a non-threatening posture. That's been my premise and instead of agreeing with it you continue to drum up reasons why a person is justified shooting an unarmed person that isn't posing a threat. Yeah I read and just cause you are dealing with a suspect with a record doesn't entitle you to shoot an unarmed suspect.
"Pow! You shot him. He was unarmed. Well he could've been armed; he has a history after all."
Yeah I think I've experience more bias first hand then you will ever acknowledge. You should watch the video of the young man in Cleveland playing with a toy gun at a park. The police opened fire within seconds; take the time and count; no way they gave him opportunity to surrender. It doesn't matter how much violence the police encounters in the line of duty, doesn't give them right to treat everyone as dangerous suspects out of fear he/she might be a bad guy. There's a reason why most of us in the military don't condone shooting unarmed enemy personnel or shoot them in the back as they are running away. Perhaps you think that is acceptable as well; after all, based on our combat experiences dealing with bad guys it fits your logic for law enforcement.
Don't bother responding. Done with your deflection.

Now we're playing the game of who gets to have the last word. LOL!
Your inability to agree that unarmed suspects should not be shot by law enforcement says all I need to know about you and your opinion on this discussion.

Now you're intentionally being ignorant and I'm doing my best to maintain my composure with your BS. Of course police officers don't work the streets with the intent to shoot an unarmed person but that doesn't absolve them of accountability when they do. It all happens in a fraction of a second? Pathetic. You insist I'm bias but everything you write demonstrates implicit bias that our law enforcement cannot do no wrong. Are you suggesting there's a problem with their training? When they make mistakes that are tragic accountability needs to be had; blaming the unarmed dead victim is BS. Well maybe Blacks should invoke their 2nd amendment rights and patrol the streets, cleanup out own neighborhoods, tell the police we'll handle it. If Oathkeepers can walk around armed the new Black Panthers can do the same.

Hahahahaha!

SCPO Don Groves - That is pretty much what I expect but when someone makes wild assertions, I ask them to prove it.

SCPO Don Groves - Oh... please do not think that I thought you were making wild assertions. I think 1LT Annala was.

Maj John Bell - What assumptions? I just posted a link. Sandy

1LT Sandy Annala - Not assumptions, but assertions; your words "Trump is saying it is Trump's job to tell us what to think." When and where did President Trump make such a statement?

What???? The Commander In Chief is not subject to the UCMJ???

Austin Hocutt - the Daily news has it right about our POS POTUS.

http://themoderatevoice.com/new-york-daily-news-classic-front-page-trumps-sexist-face-lifting-tweet/

You're right they do. They just throw the buzz-word Sexist and it instantly fills your criteria of trollable ay?

Let's talk about Mika for a second, she believes there is a wage gap between Males and Females and has publicly stated that she was lucky to work at MSNBC, basically playing the victim card by saying that she got paid less than the guys in which the guys said they did. It is stupid to work at that company that supports the "economically disadvantaged" yet has a actual wage gap or can the Democrats only do that, or does this economic disadvantaged don't go to the white female?

Face-lift:

She's 50. She looks 25, I highly doubt she doesn't have some form of toxin in her face, since that is what is hip now-a-days.

I did not spot a single "Sexist" comment in his statement, please tell me what you think it has right about him?

1LT Sandy Annala - Was that a serious question? A basic google search will answer the question, if there is doubt in your mind. As to the POS comment, I do so wish the DODOIG would have someone read idiotic comments like made in this thread. If you are retired, even unverified retired, you ARE subject to the code.