Posted on Aug 3, 2022
Gun-Makers Made Over $1.7 Billion In Assault Weapon Sales In Past Decade: House Probe
3.66K
23
29
5
5
0
Who do we serve, our Country, which is the Icon of Democracy, or the 2nd Amendment Movement that wants every American to bear arms openly as their Constitutional Right? In recent times, if the mass shootings across the Country took a break from the front page, mass stabbings took its place. A father of a PIO in the U.S. goes for a walk and is shot dead in broad daylight. Children go to school to learn and gain knowledge, but instead they become victims of massacres with guns and knives. Witnessing such gory scenes, the GOP tries to invoke its 2nd Amendment Rights etched in our Constitution and the DNC fights for gun control to tame the urge to kill in our Country. What kind of Democracy is this where we can't see the imminent threat to our Nation, Democracy and our freedoms? This should be a bipartisan effort to end violence and vengeance in our communities; get rid of homegrown terror outfits and individual terrorists in a bipartisan manner.
Gun-Makers Made Over $1.7 Billion In Assault Weapon Sales In Past Decade: House Probe
Posted from huffpost.comPosted in these groups: United States
TerrorismCounter Terrorism
Democracy
Military Community Awareness (MCA)
TerrorismCounter Terrorism Democracy Military Community Awareness (MCA)
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 7
3
3
0
Quite frankly - I would like to see the federal government try to confiscate firearms from the general populace. They do not have the power or authority to do so. even IF congress passes such a law, States have the right to completely ignore it, an injunction will be granted in a federal circuit court, and SCOTUS will strike down the legislation as unconstitutional. A well regulated militia is every able bodied person over 18 as citizens comprise the militia. national guard is not militia, that is a state government armed force. The federal government has the armed force of the country, the state government has the armed forces of the national guard of their state, and all the rest comprise the militia. That is the intent of those who wrote the document, that the citizens themselves should hold the means of defense and protection from not only foreign invasions, but from a Government that deliberately tries to strip citizens of their rights. The fastest way to an actual hot civil war will be trying to disarm the population.
Who will be in the right - those upholding the constitutional right to own and carry firearms or the Government trying to strip that right away? My stand will be upholding the constitutional right to own firearms. Government officials come and go, the constitution is forever.
To quote Benjamin Franklin: “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Every time any right in the bill of rights gets chipped away at or modified out of fear, we are ceeding essential liberties.
Who will be in the right - those upholding the constitutional right to own and carry firearms or the Government trying to strip that right away? My stand will be upholding the constitutional right to own firearms. Government officials come and go, the constitution is forever.
To quote Benjamin Franklin: “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Every time any right in the bill of rights gets chipped away at or modified out of fear, we are ceeding essential liberties.
(3)
(0)
CPT Gurinder (Gene) Rana
Government gives a carte blanche to the People authorizing the right to bear arms, so the Federal Government will not confiscate arms from the People. The U.S. Government will control the sale of arms through legislation and enforcement. The Federal Government will also control the use of arms to protect the People and stop unnecessary human sacrifice in the U.S.
(0)
(0)
SSG Robert Perrotto
CPT Gurinder (Gene) Rana - this is not the role of the federal government. Government gives NOTHING to the people, Government serves at the peoples will, and can be removed by force when all other avenues have been exhausted. This is the primary purpose of the second amendment. King George tried to disarm the colonies, historical fact, in order to subdue the colonies, it is why such a right was the second amendment to the constitution and enforces all the other rights in the bill of rights. You mistake the role of government, they do NOT lead us, they serve us. "shall not be infringed" was deliberately included to prevent government from controlling such things. And you also forget, any state can, by constitution, ignore such legislation. Just because the states agree to preventing automatic weapons does NOT mean any state cannot reassume their tenth amendment right and legislate allowing automatic weapons.
EDIT: please stop with the hyperbole "human sacrifice" - seriously? I gave 3 methods of murder that statistically have killed more people then rifles. Are those also methods of "human sacrifice"?
EDIT: please stop with the hyperbole "human sacrifice" - seriously? I gave 3 methods of murder that statistically have killed more people then rifles. Are those also methods of "human sacrifice"?
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
CPT Gurinder (Gene) Rana the criminals and mass murders don’t usually purchase their guns legally...red flag laws didn’t stop Hunter Biden from purchasing a hand gun.
IMHO the 2nd Amendment needs to be protected and we need to stop the illegal weapons entering Our Country through our ports and open border.
IMHO the 2nd Amendment needs to be protected and we need to stop the illegal weapons entering Our Country through our ports and open border.
(2)
(0)
CPT Gurinder (Gene) Rana
SPC Nancy Greene, assault rifles are manufactured in the U.S. and hand guns are also manufactured in our own country. I fail to comprehend how weapons get into the hands of children and criminals to wage war against the Icon of Democracy, the U.S. Hunter Biden owning a hand gun legally has no relevance in this case. Twisting everything into a political game is unprofessional and illogical.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
#JoeBiden Buy a Shotgun Joe Biden So So Funny!
Joe Biden has a brilliant answer for what to do with a person trying to break in your home and harm your family. #Biden
Big deal, I'm glad the 80 year old man( Owner of a liquor store )in Norco, California had a shotgun and blew part of the criminal's arm off After the criminal came in with an assault weapon to then to rob the place. Had that criminal been in the City of Los Angeles, I bet you that District attorney Gascon probably would have let him go. Had it been Alvin Bragg, the George Soros district attorney of New York, watch that 80-year-old man would be in jail. November is just around the corner and watch a lot of these George Soros district attorneys get voted out. Billionaire George Soros put in an op ed in the paper Defending his position and supporting these brain-dead district attorneys that he has been doubling down on.
Until recently, you could buy an assault weapon in Canada after a background check ( Canada has a 5 shot maximum for assault Weapons) but I know Prime Minister Trudeau is jumping on the Leftist bandwagon and trying to get rid of these as well. President Biden looks really stupid in this video.
https://youtu.be/MFjF9kW9Mcc
Until recently, you could buy an assault weapon in Canada after a background check ( Canada has a 5 shot maximum for assault Weapons) but I know Prime Minister Trudeau is jumping on the Leftist bandwagon and trying to get rid of these as well. President Biden looks really stupid in this video.
https://youtu.be/MFjF9kW9Mcc
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google