6
6
0
The Title "Looked" Really Good. Then I started reading this wondering "What is this guy really trying to say?" Then I got to the 5th Paragraph:
"Interpreting the Second Amendment by analogy to the First not only helps judges gauge the strength of the common good justification needed to set the natural right aside, but it also has the specific advantage of importing a well-reticulated body of neutral First Amendment principles to help guide a Second Amendment law that is still in its infancy and to which judges may not be as well-disposed because of professional and social position."
"...justification needed to set the natural right aside,..."
"Shall Not be Infringed"
This is the Kind of Infringement discussion that is very dangerous to the 2A. The issue is talked around in circles, then an infringement bomb gets dropped, then right back to drivel blah blah blah. I bet He gets a tingle every time He re-reads that paragraph.
TSgt David L., SPC Randy Zimmerman,
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
PO3 Bob McCord, SSG Gordon Holmes,
COL Mikel J. Burroughs, SGT Robert Pryor,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, Maj Marty Hogan,
1SG Steven Imerman, MAJ Karl Swenson,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi, CW5 Jack Cardwell,
MSgt David Hoffman, SSG Michael Noll,
SPC Nancy Greene, CPL Dave Hoover
"Interpreting the Second Amendment by analogy to the First not only helps judges gauge the strength of the common good justification needed to set the natural right aside, but it also has the specific advantage of importing a well-reticulated body of neutral First Amendment principles to help guide a Second Amendment law that is still in its infancy and to which judges may not be as well-disposed because of professional and social position."
"...justification needed to set the natural right aside,..."
"Shall Not be Infringed"
This is the Kind of Infringement discussion that is very dangerous to the 2A. The issue is talked around in circles, then an infringement bomb gets dropped, then right back to drivel blah blah blah. I bet He gets a tingle every time He re-reads that paragraph.
TSgt David L., SPC Randy Zimmerman,
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
PO3 Bob McCord, SSG Gordon Holmes,
COL Mikel J. Burroughs, SGT Robert Pryor,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, Maj Marty Hogan,
1SG Steven Imerman, MAJ Karl Swenson,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi, CW5 Jack Cardwell,
MSgt David Hoffman, SSG Michael Noll,
SPC Nancy Greene, CPL Dave Hoover
Gun Rights Delayed Can Be Gun Rights Denied
Posted from illinoislawreview.org
2nd Amendment
Self Defense
Gun Control
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 2
2
2
0
It reads more as speculative thought, rather than constitutionally-supported facts.
Apparently "Shall not be infringed" is too tough for the author to understand.
John O. McGinnis is attempting to BWB (Baffle With Bullshit).
Apparently "Shall not be infringed" is too tough for the author to understand.
John O. McGinnis is attempting to BWB (Baffle With Bullshit).
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
Sure, there exists circumstances that provide the "justification needed to set the natural right [of keeping and bearing arms] aside...". The same justification that we use to set aside other natural rights of the individual -- his criminal behavior. We traditionally try an accused criminal by a jury, and if he is found guilty we impose a penalty for the proven guilt.
It may be to set aside his personal liberty, and freedom to "pursue happiness" by incarceration. It could also lead to his right to life itself being revoked by the state.
Let's keep the "justification to set aside rights" on an individual level, not the collective mindset of the socialist planners.
It may be to set aside his personal liberty, and freedom to "pursue happiness" by incarceration. It could also lead to his right to life itself being revoked by the state.
Let's keep the "justification to set aside rights" on an individual level, not the collective mindset of the socialist planners.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google