Avatar feed
Responses: 8
SSG Program Control Manager
6
6
0
The Clinton's aren't very fond of people glossing over technicalities. Technically the money came from lobbyists of the fossil fuel industry, not directly from companies like Exxon Mobil. That said, this is from back in March... if you have to reach that far back to show her annoyed, that's saying something as well.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SGT Team Leader
SGT (Join to see)
8 y
Yep, very true.
Even remember this from when Bernie was still on the trail. I pointed to it to show media bias - the person asking the question was painted as a "bernie bro" when actually she was a green peace volunteer and was backing Jill Stein.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Kevin Ford
5
5
0
A good tactic to paper over a candidates weaknesses is to try and show the other candidate once did something similar. Hence this video. Of course when one candidate does it all the time and the other you have to look back six months to find an incident of it then you have a false equivalency. The problem being that most people won't think that part through or check and then think to themselves, well maybe both do it so it's not an issue.

This is also why we get people trying to show equivalency between something that is normally released (tax returns) and something that is not (potentially private emails and speech transcripts).
(5)
Comment
(0)
SPC James Harsh
SPC James Harsh
8 y
SPC Kevin Ford - I'm not talking about Trump, and are you defending Hillary's lacky the ex-Miss Universe in the well timed tv Ads. She has a rap sheet including threating a judge and lying about her eating disorder, an accomplice to attempted murder. That one? I bet she's not compensated. Trump is a jetsetter so what time for him to do anything isn't relative. Where was Hillary @ 3Am
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
SPC Kevin Ford
8 y
SPC James Harsh - Probably getting some sleep, being able to let go and get some sleep is a good quality in a leader. Sleep deprivation leads to bad decision making.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT Team Leader
SGT (Join to see)
8 y
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Team Leader
SGT (Join to see)
8 y
SPC James Harsh - Wait, you're not talking about Trump?
So this is in a vacuum, where-in you simply have a problem with Mrs. Clinton?
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Team Leader
2
2
0
Yes, this one action discredits her from being President because she stated she had the temperament to be presidential over Mr. Trump's temperament.

That was heavy sarcasm, Mr. Trump has had more tantrums in the last week compared to this, which occured during the Primaries around march. I remember when this occurred, shoot I even pointed to it as a reason to back Bernie more. Still a far reach to prove a strained point.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SPC James Harsh
SPC James Harsh
8 y
She's a fascade
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Team Leader
SGT (Join to see)
8 y
And he should probably develop one at this point.
Listen, it's easy enough: Either you like him because he speaks his mind and you somewhat agree with his honestly dirtbag statements; or you think his words should be ignored because he's not knowledgable in these matters.
Either way, it's not exactly a great point to fight from.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close