Avatar feed
Responses: 5
PO3 Donald Murphy
2
2
0
The problem is that the diesel infrastructure went away. We basically have none. So we'd have to build everything all over again from scratch. This would make the Joint Strike Fighter debacle appear trivial. Then, from a submarine point of view, its old technology. And dangerous technology.
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ James Woods
1
1
0
A diesel-electric submarine? That's interesting. Won't lie, I was expecting a 'caterpillar driven' submarine like the fictional yet theoretical one in "Hunt for Red October". Will be interesting to see how our naval strategy and engineering strategy changes based on this type of threat.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Michael Bischoff
1
1
0
Why not try solar powered? :)
(1)
Comment
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
7 y
MSgt Michael Bischoff Now There is a Serious Challenge!
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Donald Murphy
PO3 Donald Murphy
7 y
The problem is the storage batteries. Battery acid, when mixed with sea water, creates chlorine gas. Which then, as if killing you wasn't enough - becomes explosive. See USS Bonefish, 1988. So for that reason, battery storage propulsion is a no-no. The solar part of charging the batteries via a snorkel-type mast, would be "safe" but the battery storage itself is the biggest issue.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Michael Bischoff
MSgt Michael Bischoff
7 y
PO3 Donald Murphy - I’ve seen “Das Boot” I remember their battery issues.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close