Posted on Oct 26, 2023
Ivanka Trump hit with motion to force her to testify in dad’s fraud trial
298
10
2
5
5
0
Posted 7 mo ago
Responses: 2
Ivanka Trump Trying To Weasel Out Of Testifying Against Her Family
Ivanka Trump is terrified about the thought of having to testify against her father and brothers that her lawyers have filed a flimsy and almost laughable mo...
YouTuber analysis of the Raw Story article about why her lawyers arguments (subpoena, deposition, jurisdiction) don't hold up as valid reasons. Since she is considered a witness instead of a defendant, refusing to testify can mean contempt of court.
https://youtu.be/GL0OIfF1690?si=aW8EX4yc1BEhrL0G
https://youtu.be/GL0OIfF1690?si=aW8EX4yc1BEhrL0G
(3)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
...""The NYAG, which never deposed Ms. Trump, is effectively trying to force her back into this case from which she was dismissed by a unanimous decision of the Appellate Division, First Department," her legal team wrote. "Ms. Trump is not a party in this action. Nor is Ms. Trump a New York resident. It is black-letter law that, given those two facts, Ms. Trump is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court."
In a filing on Thursday, James disputed the arguments.
"Ms. Trump was served properly at the New York addresses and actual place of business of multiple entities that are under her control; she should be compelled to testify in this proceeding," James wrote. "But even beyond that, Ms. Trump remains financially and professionally intertwined with the Trump Organization and other Defendants and can be called as a person still under their control."...
...""The NYAG, which never deposed Ms. Trump, is effectively trying to force her back into this case from which she was dismissed by a unanimous decision of the Appellate Division, First Department," her legal team wrote. "Ms. Trump is not a party in this action. Nor is Ms. Trump a New York resident. It is black-letter law that, given those two facts, Ms. Trump is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court."
In a filing on Thursday, James disputed the arguments.
"Ms. Trump was served properly at the New York addresses and actual place of business of multiple entities that are under her control; she should be compelled to testify in this proceeding," James wrote. "But even beyond that, Ms. Trump remains financially and professionally intertwined with the Trump Organization and other Defendants and can be called as a person still under their control."...
(2)
(0)
Read This Next