Avatar feed
Responses: 7
Col Squadron Commander
6
6
0
Edited >1 y ago
Wow, this upsets me greatly! And I am surprised that a Circuit judge is not acknowledging a Federal Act!
(6)
Comment
(0)
MSG Wade Huffman
MSG Wade Huffman
>1 y
That pretty much sums up what I was thinking.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SFC Maintenance Supervisor
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
MCPO Gene Treants posted that the Judge had a change of heart after the media attention.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
SSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) - I wonder why????
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Maintenance Supervisor
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Ssgt Larry Olson- I'm not sure why a Judge would make such a rash decision unless she too has been a single mother or has been divorced and maybe had a bad experience in doing so. I do know that the original decision she made put the Sailor in a catch 22. He has custody of his child so that in itself should have told the Judge he is a responsible dad. But unfortunately we aren't clear of the whole story.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CMDCM Gene Treants
5
5
0
As a retired Sailor and A retired Child Protective Supervisor this upsets me in two ways. First the Sailor is being denied his rights by a Judge who knows nothing about hoe the Navy makes sure children are cared for when parents deploy. Secondly, CPS makes damn sure the family the child is place in can care for her under ALL circumstances, even deployment.

This judge needs to be reigned in. NOW!
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Ben Keen
3
3
0
I don't understand how the judge can ignore a Federal act. I want to know the background behind what led to this even getting in front of judge. If he has full custody and enacted his Family Care Plan for his deployment and the child is taken care, then what is going?
(3)
Comment
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
>1 y
Is anyone able to find an update on this? The original report was from June 21, 2014.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close