Posted on Oct 27, 2016
Jury acquits leaders of Oregon standoff of federal charges
2.37K
16
17
4
4
0
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 3
Complete and utter BS. "Couldn't determine who the guns belonged to? So this should be the perfect defense when cops raid a trap house. Weapons aren't mine, and neither are the drugs, We're just sitting here watching the game on a stolen tv that none of us took.
(1)
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
SGT Damaso V Santana - last time I checked, if you were near a drug, a weapon, stolen property, it was yours, and in your possession. You did not notify anyone, did nothing to get away from the material, and you did nothing to get those responsible to to the police, making it yours and your problem. How in the hell is this not the perfect slam dunk? Did you: 1. Have weapons? Yes
2. Take property that isn't yours? yes
3. Occupy federal property that wasn't yours? yes
4. Defy police orders to leave? yes
5. On multiple occasions refuse police orders? yes
6. Present a weapon on law enforcement? yes, but that dumbass is pushing daisies.
2. Take property that isn't yours? yes
3. Occupy federal property that wasn't yours? yes
4. Defy police orders to leave? yes
5. On multiple occasions refuse police orders? yes
6. Present a weapon on law enforcement? yes, but that dumbass is pushing daisies.
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
SGT Damaso V Santana - I discovered RW Service as boy. When I left home, I had a chip on my shoulder against my dad, I suppose like many young men. Anyhow my first visit home afterward, we were sitting around the house and my dad asks, "Any you boys ever read Robert W Service?" I answered, "Wouldn't you expect to find a man an awful crank, who's staked well nigh a hundred claims and every one's a blank. Who's seen the rise and fall of camps where men got gold in chunks, and he got none at all." (a buchery, but what I can recall off the top of my head) My youngest brother says, "I'm sorry, since you've come so far, you ain't the one that wins;
But won't you take a step inside--I'LL LET YOU SEE THE TWINS." Of course the closing lines of the same poem. I knew I was my father's son, and these were my brothers!
But won't you take a step inside--I'LL LET YOU SEE THE TWINS." Of course the closing lines of the same poem. I knew I was my father's son, and these were my brothers!
(1)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
SGT Damaso V Santana - As to the actual story that you posted, I suspect the reason that they were aquitted was because, 1. the jury was sympathetic over the land use issues that spurred the occupation in the first place. 2. because there were as many or more FBI informers present than there were ranchers/protesters/bandits/thugs depending on your point of view.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next