Posted on Feb 17, 2017
Lawrence Solomon: Finally it's safe for the whistleblowers of corrupted climate science to speak...
1.17K
19
17
6
6
0
Edited 8 y ago
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 9
I've been saying this (literally) for years. Things not mentioned:
1) the amount of parametric data used in the "research"... they are literally naking it up
2) the "real" data used come predominately from the US & western Europe. How do you make the leap to world-wide inferences?
3) atmospheric water is not accounted for... not even taken into account.
4) we have world-wide temperature records going back to the 1700's and earlier (thank you British navy). Why are those lobgitudinal data IGNORED?
1) the amount of parametric data used in the "research"... they are literally naking it up
2) the "real" data used come predominately from the US & western Europe. How do you make the leap to world-wide inferences?
3) atmospheric water is not accounted for... not even taken into account.
4) we have world-wide temperature records going back to the 1700's and earlier (thank you British navy). Why are those lobgitudinal data IGNORED?
(2)
(0)
Ask any mathematician or statistician: "All models are wrong, but some models are useful" is a true statement always.
Climate models are used in these climate studies, not actual temperatures or soil studies for the most part. Models can be skewed by the data scientist for any purpose they like.
If they want to show warming- then they'll weight the model one way- If they want cooling, they can likewise weight the model in any fashion they want to.
Look up Michael Mann's famous "hockey stick" study showing large increases in temperature, where there really was little or no increases in mean temperatures over the last 60 years. The true data was destroyed, leaving only his "adjusted data" to show the global warming hoax.
NASA and NOAA do the same thing with their data- it's model (not actual temperatures across the globe) is manipulated to show this years 2018 temperature as "the hottest on record". Total sham! It's all manufactured to show a crisis where none exists- all to get more "climate change" funding.
Climate models are used in these climate studies, not actual temperatures or soil studies for the most part. Models can be skewed by the data scientist for any purpose they like.
If they want to show warming- then they'll weight the model one way- If they want cooling, they can likewise weight the model in any fashion they want to.
Look up Michael Mann's famous "hockey stick" study showing large increases in temperature, where there really was little or no increases in mean temperatures over the last 60 years. The true data was destroyed, leaving only his "adjusted data" to show the global warming hoax.
NASA and NOAA do the same thing with their data- it's model (not actual temperatures across the globe) is manipulated to show this years 2018 temperature as "the hottest on record". Total sham! It's all manufactured to show a crisis where none exists- all to get more "climate change" funding.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
The only state in the Union that does the captain trade in carbon tax model like Ontario is California. I bet you Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Governor Jerry Brown and Nancy Pelosi and maybe even Maxine Waters are taking Kaopectate this week because of the fact they lost their prime example of the progressive climate change mitigation model that will bankrupt a province or in this case a state is now gone. California wants to go a hundred percent clean energy by 2045 but I was even listening on NPR where they have to have a natural gas-fired plant always idling and ready to go full frontal if a cloud covers those solar panels in the desert, power drops off tremendously and there isn't technology to store the power yet so they have to keep carbon producing gas-fired plants. In Ontario, they spent a billion dollars building and then dismantling a gas-fired plant that was going to go online very soon. That's part of the scandal of that Province. The Scandal goes back too many years to include conservative governments. That's why I'm saying that you could be conservative and stupid if you're an environmental Zealot that doesn't take into consideration what do you need to build. Ontario ended up building so much infrastructure that they ended up having too much power available but all their clients had the pay for it. That's why electricity is triple what it's supposed to be. They went to the extreme and this is a warning to California not to go to the extreme. I bet you they won't listen!
(0)
(0)
All data can (and was) be skewed to suit the purpose. This is insane- a lot of us have been complaining about this for years, but it's been falling on deaf ears. It's about time that common sense has finally come to the fore front of the conversation. Can someone please tell AL Gore that A. He is full of Dookie and B. He didn't invent the internet
S/F
S/F
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
And this came from the Canadian newspaper but I know had Minister Justin Trudeau will blow it off and still in post is $3 a gallon carbon tax to save his pocketbook. He doesn't care you know what he owns he owns that Mercedes 300 the one with the doors that open like a Lamborghini made in the fifties a just it is a spoiled kid
(0)
(0)
GySgt Melissa Gravila
LTC (Join to see) - it's sad how hypocritical some people are- get out of the Ivory towers and walk among us minions- then I will listen. You know what I mean?
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
GySgt Melissa Gravila - and this guy has a uncle or sort of a Godfather and his name is Fidel Castro!
(1)
(0)
Read This Next