Posted on Nov 3, 2016
LCS Montgomery Sustains Second Hull Crack in a Month
1.31K
8
6
3
3
0
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 4
What is the deal here? Evidently there are SERIOUS design flaws with these vessels. No amount of crew "retraining" is going to cure a bad design.
(2)
(0)
I got my degree in Naval Architecture from the US Naval Academy in 82. There was a "style difference" between US warship design and Soviet warship design. The new hull forms and lower radar profile designs appear to be following the old Soviet style. The soviet warships looked cool, but were never really designed as all-season blue water warships. Flat plate designs are more prone to "slamming" from wave action, and poorer sea keeping characteristics. This increases vibrational stresses on flat plate hulls that are inherently less resistant to metal fatigue than curved plates.
(1)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
Maj John Bell , so if I understand you correctly, the powers that be chose looks over practicality?
(0)
(0)
Maj John Bell
MSG (Join to see) - It has been a long time since I did any hull design and I haven't seen the drag and sea keeping tests on out new vessels, but it sure looks that way.
The soviets made a conscious choice. Side by side in neutral open ports their ships looked "cooler" and more "ferocious". But humint sources told us that experienced sea hands were miserable aboard during rough seas, that they were constantly fixing failure due to vibrational fatigue, and expected hull life was about 60% of similar class US warships.
The soviets made a conscious choice. Side by side in neutral open ports their ships looked "cooler" and more "ferocious". But humint sources told us that experienced sea hands were miserable aboard during rough seas, that they were constantly fixing failure due to vibrational fatigue, and expected hull life was about 60% of similar class US warships.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next