Posted on Dec 12, 2017
Men Accused of Plotting Kansas Mosque Bombing Demand Jury of Trump Voters: Report
2.01K
8
9
1
1
0
Every lowlife would prefer a jury of like-minded individuals ---- that would be like Charles Manson being judged only by members of his deluded criminal posse. LTC (Join to see) Capt Gregory Prickett CPT Jack Durish GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad
Men Accused of Plotting Kansas Mosque Bombing Demand Jury of Trump Voters: Report
Posted from alternet.org
Law
Terrorism
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 8
2
2
0
I don't think these people would get quite the support they think they would from a jury of Trump supporters.
Regardless, the problem the prosecution has, according to what I've read on this, is that these people so far had only talked about a plot to bomb a mosque. If this is true, then there is an important distinction to be made here, and that is how the prosecution proves that "talking about" an action translates into an actual reasonable fear that the action was going to take place.
If the prosecution has evidence, for example, that shows these people were gathering equipment and supplies which directly support the plot(s) they were "talking about", then they have a pretty strong case. If not, and all they have is a bunch of unsupported "talking" going on, then the prosecution has a hard road to pave towards a conviction.
It's part of MMO: Method, Motive, Opportunity.
If you can provide all three in evidence, you've a strong case in your favor. If not, you've a much weaker case.
Regardless, the problem the prosecution has, according to what I've read on this, is that these people so far had only talked about a plot to bomb a mosque. If this is true, then there is an important distinction to be made here, and that is how the prosecution proves that "talking about" an action translates into an actual reasonable fear that the action was going to take place.
If the prosecution has evidence, for example, that shows these people were gathering equipment and supplies which directly support the plot(s) they were "talking about", then they have a pretty strong case. If not, and all they have is a bunch of unsupported "talking" going on, then the prosecution has a hard road to pave towards a conviction.
It's part of MMO: Method, Motive, Opportunity.
If you can provide all three in evidence, you've a strong case in your favor. If not, you've a much weaker case.
(2)
(0)
1
1
0
PO1 Tony Holland Some Real Pillars of Society *SARCASM MUCH* Looking for a Fair Impartial Trial from their Peers in the Far Right Republican Party. *FACEPALM*
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google