Posted on Apr 4, 2019
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) pact signed
2.32K
29
9
15
15
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
(0)
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
The utility of NATO is unclear to me as there are an infinite number of variables. I will try to make a reasonable assessment using the Principle of War: Mass, Maneuver, Simplicity, Surprise, Security, Unity of Command, Objective, Offensive, Economy of force as the overarching way we will fight.
However we need to consider:
- Military capabilities, tactics, and doctrine of other nations.
- Compatibility of equipment, tactics, vehicles, aircraft, ships, and planes.
- Logistics for supplies, military movement, Ports of Entry, beachheads, and maintenance.
- Attrition during war, production capabilities, and flexibility to innovate.
- Deep thinking leaders like Eisenhower who developed the American campaign plan for Africa and Europe. Nimitz and Macarthur for the pacific campaign.
- Multi National training and exercises.
I am sure others can add to this list.
However we need to consider:
- Military capabilities, tactics, and doctrine of other nations.
- Compatibility of equipment, tactics, vehicles, aircraft, ships, and planes.
- Logistics for supplies, military movement, Ports of Entry, beachheads, and maintenance.
- Attrition during war, production capabilities, and flexibility to innovate.
- Deep thinking leaders like Eisenhower who developed the American campaign plan for Africa and Europe. Nimitz and Macarthur for the pacific campaign.
- Multi National training and exercises.
I am sure others can add to this list.
(1)
(0)
It would not surprise me if China tries to influence Europe by getting access to infrastructure and economies.
(1)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
That's already happened/happening.
https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/brief/belt-and-road-initiative
https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/brief/belt-and-road-initiative
(1)
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ (Join to see) - Thanks for the great picture. Add in the Philippines for giving sovereignty to the seas around her and Australia for a 99 year lease of the Port of Darwin. I totally find it repulsive for out "allied countries" to give in to the Belt and Road Initiative. To me they are Blue Falcons.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
Well, we're not in a state of "declared war" with China/PRC. "Allies" literally means you've signed a mutual defense treaty stating that if another country declares war on a nation-state, you agree that you're obligated by international law to come to the defense of your "Ally." That's it. You don't have to support jack squat short of declared war.
While I would almost be inclined to agree in general principle, countries act in their own self-interest. Hell, we are probably the single largest export market for Chinese goods. Would you support a 100% trade ban on products made in China? I think not. Prices would double overnight on a large section of consumer goods we currently get from PRC.
While I would almost be inclined to agree in general principle, countries act in their own self-interest. Hell, we are probably the single largest export market for Chinese goods. Would you support a 100% trade ban on products made in China? I think not. Prices would double overnight on a large section of consumer goods we currently get from PRC.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next