Posted on Aug 11, 2016
Obama's Latest Executive Order - Who's in the Crosshairs Now? - Uncle Sam's Misguided Children
1.18K
0
5
0
0
0
There are those who say this EO gives the military the ok to fight Americans on American soil.
Though I despise the S.O.B. in the Whitehouse I don't think thats what this is saying.
However it brings up a interesting question:
If shit was to hit the fan in this country, say a armed revolution, do you think the U.S. military would fire upon U.S. citizens?
Though I despise the S.O.B. in the Whitehouse I don't think thats what this is saying.
However it brings up a interesting question:
If shit was to hit the fan in this country, say a armed revolution, do you think the U.S. military would fire upon U.S. citizens?
Obama's Latest Executive Order - Who's in the Crosshairs Now? - Uncle Sam's Misguided Children
Posted from unclesamsmisguidedchildren.comPosted in these groups: 
Politics
Military service
Politics Military service
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
0
0
0
Once again, some react without knowing the truth.
Nothing in this executive order calls for or authorizes the United States military to use force against American civilians, nor does the order "change the rules of engagement between the military vs ordinary US citizens." Rather, this executive order aims to curb civilian causalities during the use of force in areas of conflict outside the U.S.
May I suggest we read the order first before crying wolf?
Nothing in this executive order calls for or authorizes the United States military to use force against American civilians, nor does the order "change the rules of engagement between the military vs ordinary US citizens." Rather, this executive order aims to curb civilian causalities during the use of force in areas of conflict outside the U.S.
May I suggest we read the order first before crying wolf?
(0)
(0)
PO1 Tracy Dreyer
May I suggest you read my post before you assume I am saying that is what it says? I simply used this as a lead in to ask a hypothetical question
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
If it is an armed revolution as you say, it would be the duty of the Armed Forces to defend and protect the Constitution.
(0)
(0)
SPC Ken Sawyer
Constitution not the president or the government for that matter and by the way its a crime to use the federal armed forces against the American people. The states can use the National Guard to keep the peace but the Army or Marines can not be used.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google