Avatar feed
Responses: 3
SSG(P) Casualty Operations Ncoic
0
0
0
I just think it's funny (in a twisted sort of way) that politicians don't want to think about planning for a nuclear strike on their city, so they outlaw preparing for it. There should be some sort of psychological test for those seeking public office; apparently we have too many who are teetering on the edge of sanity.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Wayne Wood
Sgt Wayne Wood
>1 y
Don't you have to be intelligent in order to be judged sane/insane?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Bryan Zeski
0
0
0
I think it makes sense for Seattle to re-engage with options on "preparing for the worst." Heck, the CDC has a Zombie Preparedness Page with tips on how to prepare for the Zombie Apocalypse. Why? Because if they can get people in the mindset of preparing for that, the people will already be in the mindset to prepare for actual issues.
https://www.cdc.gov/phpr/zombies.htm
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Edward Tilton
0
0
0
Let's rush out and spend billions on a defense system to stop the non existent threat.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG Edward Tilton
SSG Edward Tilton
>1 y
I would think that underground would be the last place to hide from a Tsunami
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Business Advisement
PO3 (Join to see)
>1 y
Sgt Wayne Wood - LOL,,, he thought you meant that underground fallout bunkers could double as Tsunami shelters. Oh my sides are hurting on that one.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
>1 y
Which threat is non-existent?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Edward Tilton
SSG Edward Tilton
>1 y
MAJ Bryan Zeski - North Korea has never conducted an atmospheric burst and it's underground tests were small enough that the could have been conventional. So far their missiles have been erratic, one was only 60 miles from Russia. Erratic is not good with nukes.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close