Avatar feed
Responses: 2
SPC Darren Koele
1
1
0
I take issue with this because, aggressive marketing or not, it is the doctors who prescribe the drugs. Where is the doctors responsibility in all this. I mean, unless you have evidence that the drug manufactures themselves are selling these on the streets (interesting thought but I try to avoid conspiracies), there is only two paths to them getting out to the public; one is theft, the other is doctors.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
1
1
0
Is it the phamacuetical companies' fault that legal controlled narcotics were prescribed for various maladies? Or is it more accurate to say that the doctors were negligent in oversight on their patients and dosage, that the patients in many (but not all cases) chose to abuse to the point of addiction, and that HMOs and not least VA hospitals determined that "pain management" was cheaper than other options like surgery.
It is easy to pin blame on an entity that makes a legal product, like tobacco, alcohol, guns, or drugs. Yet we all too easily turn against these companies when working to assign blame elsewhere than where it belongs. The drug companies did market their products, and pay doctors kickback for prescribing their products over a competitor's. But the dangers of opium-based narcotics is hardly something that was unknown, indeed for centuries.
I think these lawsuits serve a dual purpose: to reassign blame and to be a lottery ticket for those who have lost family members. Both are ignoble and immoral.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close