Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SP5 Dennis Loberger
1
1
0
Custer beat Napoleon to General by 1 year
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LCDR Joshua Gillespie
1
1
0
A good summary. I've always been fascinated by him (hey, dynamite comes in small packages). My take is that he was an excellent commander because he understood how artillery, cavalry, and infantry work as one...the precursor to modern combined arms theory. He was a highly successful leader because he understood the powerful imagery of the head of state at the head of the battle. Others tried to copy him (de Santa Anna most notably)...but he was indeed "unique".
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Christopher Brose
1
1
0
I've got other things on my to-read list, but I'll be interested to get see your observations.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close