Posted on Feb 22, 2016
Report: U.S. aircraft carriers’ ‘unchallenged primacy may be coming to a close’
2.16K
5
8
1
1
0
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 6
Capt Lance Gallardo What those pundits fail to mention is all the countermeasures we have against those land-based anti-ship missiles. Everything from cruiser screens to Phalanx guns, to kinetic kill vehicles, to escorts physically interposing themselves. Submarines are a much greater threat, and always have been.
Carrier aviation as it is today IS going to fade, but not because of some mythical ship-killing missile (which has always been an issue). No, like the battleships, which are no longer around for one simple reason (that a modern day destroyer can deliver more kinetic and chemical energy down range than the BB's could, at a fraction of the cost), the carriers today are going to morph into autonomous drone carriers. Rather than 90 piloted aircraft, they're going to carry 900 autonomous drones that will swarm enemies, much like insects.
So yeah, I think we're in the last iteration of current version of super carriers...but it's not because anybody can kill them at whim.
Carrier aviation as it is today IS going to fade, but not because of some mythical ship-killing missile (which has always been an issue). No, like the battleships, which are no longer around for one simple reason (that a modern day destroyer can deliver more kinetic and chemical energy down range than the BB's could, at a fraction of the cost), the carriers today are going to morph into autonomous drone carriers. Rather than 90 piloted aircraft, they're going to carry 900 autonomous drones that will swarm enemies, much like insects.
So yeah, I think we're in the last iteration of current version of super carriers...but it's not because anybody can kill them at whim.
(2)
(0)
Build a better 'mouse' and someone will build a better mouse trap. I's a cyclical thing.
(1)
(0)
Capt Lance Gallardo
But Chief Coluccio, I wonder if the US Navy is going to go through the same difficult transition (some say it took Pearl Harbor) as the Navy Paradigm shifted away from Battleships to Aircraft Carriers. The Navy had to "retire or fire" a helluva lot of Old School Battleship Admirals at the inception of WWII to get the Navy to buy into the idea that the Aircraft Carrier, after Pearl Harbor, would be the mainstay of Naval Power. We don' have a world wide war that gives the Navy Innovators and Changers the upper-hand in that power struggle, nor have we just been handed a crushing defeat like Pear Harbor, where we just lost a multi-billion dollar carrier and three thousand souls, to get the Navy to change?
(0)
(0)
The Carrier Debate: From 1922 to Now - USNI News
Even years before its launch, the U.S. Navy’s new class of ships — the aircraft carrier — was dismissed by some critics as an exorbitantly expensive folly that was already obsolete due to advances in modern warfare. Although this argument has often been levied at USS Gerald R Ford (CVN-78) currently under construction, it was …
(0)
(0)
Read This Next