Posted on Feb 4, 2016
Service Members (Past, Present, and Future) Should Use RallyPoint
4.15K
19
5
10
10
0
I plan to share this article with SVO, VetSuccess, and VA staff personnel. People look at me crazy when I talk about Rallypoint.
Service Members (Past, Present, and Future) Should Use RallyPoint
Posted from jtspratley.comPosted in these groups: 
RallyPoint
Blogging
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Airborne School
RallyPoint
RallyPoint Blogging Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Airborne School RallyPoint
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
3
3
0
I think that past and present US military service members should be extended an invitation to join RallyPoint SGT (Join to see). I do not think it is wise for future service members to join RallyPoint. FYI as far as I am concerned military school cadets are service members (in training or in fact based on prior service).
(3)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
"Future" was meant to identify cadets or those underway to join. Do i need to further specify that ?
(1)
(0)
LTC Stephen F.
SGT (Join to see) - perhaps that needs to be defined. By the time I was 10 years old I was a future military man since my heart was set on it. I am connected with a few cadets - USMA and ROTC.
I wrestle with the idea of open and unbounded discussions with pre-commissioning cadets on RallyPoint. The PTSD discussions and some of the other disabled veteran discussions may convince some to change their mind about serving in the military. That may be an appropriate response but it could also be a premature decision based on partial information.
I wrestle with the idea of open and unbounded discussions with pre-commissioning cadets on RallyPoint. The PTSD discussions and some of the other disabled veteran discussions may convince some to change their mind about serving in the military. That may be an appropriate response but it could also be a premature decision based on partial information.
(3)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
I'll further define "future." RP does allow pre-commissioned cadets to join, don't they ?
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google