Posted on Oct 9, 2018
String of radar stations in Canadian Arctic nearly obsolete — and modernizing them will cost...
1.89K
59
19
12
12
0
Posted 6 y ago
Responses: 4
LTC (Join to see) Upkeep and Maintenance is Not Cheap. Like a Lot of other things have to Gauge whether it would be Cheaper to Replace Them or Restore them.
(7)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen - You Mean Like the UYK-20 that they kept this Dinosaur (Yours Truly) around for an Extra Year to Retire at the Same Time.
(2)
(0)
(2)
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel Sure, a few pots of coffee to keep you running longer and then toss both dinosaurs out together. :-)
(2)
(0)
I think its time to replace with something new that uses a backscatter approach along the lines of the two mothballed - AN/FPS-118's - especially in light of Russia's hypersonic capabilities of Mach 8 or 6138.15 mph. The 118's had a range of 3,000 miles - that would only yield a 30 minutes heads up. Impressive system for just two units - Southern and Northern units were canceled and never built - due to "the end of the Cold War."
A little back story these units were operational 40 hours a week at random times. The radar data was fed to the U.S. Customs/Coast Guard C3I Center, Miami; Joint Task Force 4 Operations Center, Key West; U.S. Southern Command Operations Center, Key West; and U.S. Southern Command Operations Center, Panama.
A little back story these units were operational 40 hours a week at random times. The radar data was fed to the U.S. Customs/Coast Guard C3I Center, Miami; Joint Task Force 4 Operations Center, Key West; U.S. Southern Command Operations Center, Key West; and U.S. Southern Command Operations Center, Panama.
(4)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
Thank you for letting us know about the system. This system sounds just as important as a border wall.
(2)
(0)
(1)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
The physics involved in back scatter limits it use and utility and it resistance to ECM. The revived signals are VERY Very low in enegy
(0)
(0)
SPC David S.
Yes this approach has issues being reliant on the ionosphere just one of many being low energy makes it easy to molest - I think it would be just another tier in OTHR systems. I think the most reliable would be a space based approach - I know the NRO is very hush hush on what is currently deployed - Lacrosse or Onyx - but I think the CIA and NRO may have a new approach in mind - just not sure if it was funded - but the funding always seems to happen via back channels - 5 billion in "refrigerators" isn't always "refrigerators".
(0)
(0)
Read This Next