Posted on Mar 17, 2019
Students are striking for action on climate change — a truancy everyone should applaud
706
4
3
2
2
0
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
The Great Global Warming Swindle - Full Documentary HD
The Great Global Warming Swindle caused controversy in the UK when it premiered March 8, 2007 on British Channel 4. A documentary, by British television prod...
No. They should go to class. The adults directing them to do this should be fired. BTW, this kind of theatrical nonsense, along with other shenanigans, such as the insanity of calling people "climate deniers", or the constant, laughable predictions of "We only have {fill in random number here} years until it's too late!", and resistance to any call for serious scientific debate ("The science is settled!!!!" - screamed from spittle-flecked lips below wild, unblinking eyes), all lead me to completely reject the climate alarmism BS as anything other than utter, and complete hooey.
This is dated, but it covers the general impression I have of the whole "climate" cult silliness: https://youtu.be/oYhCQv5tNsQ
Read some stuff from Patrick J. Michaels and Bjorn Lomborg.
This is dated, but it covers the general impression I have of the whole "climate" cult silliness: https://youtu.be/oYhCQv5tNsQ
Read some stuff from Patrick J. Michaels and Bjorn Lomborg.
(1)
(0)
Here's my problem with the whole "climate change" debate... it's not being discussed objectively, on either side. I'll readily admit that a climatologist knows much more about the nature of these things in operation than I do... or at least, they should. However, let's assume "worst case scenario"; are there any solutions that don't require a devastating, all encompassing, radical course of action? If we're going to wreck the economy of the Western World, risk global war to impose the cure on "non-compliant" nations (i.e. China, Russia), and disestablish sovereign governments around the globe (because you'd have to) leading to wide-spread civil unrest/war, revolution... shouldn't we have a mature, objective, fact-based, non-biased discussion at the highest levels? I'm a parent, and I believe children shouldn't be side-lined... but they do not have the experience to lead such an effort. It's presumptuous, and frankly, counterproductive, to encourage such behavior as a means to an end. If I were a major world leader (say, the President), I'd want to hear scientists ON BOTH SIDES OF THE DEBATE bring in detailed facts/figures/predictions, and then have them work with equally non-partisan experts in every field from economics and defense to sociology and law, to provide options with a scale of impacts from "good to terrible" that could be implemented.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next