Posted on Jun 27, 2017
Supreme Court Revives Parts Of Trump's Travel Ban As It Agrees To Hear Case
2.86K
30
13
11
11
0
via npr: Supreme Court Revives Parts Of Trump's Travel Ban As It Agrees To Hear Case
Supreme Court Revives Parts Of Trump's Travel Ban As It Agrees To Hear Case
Posted from n.pr
Supreme Court
Donald Trump
Travel
Immigration
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
2
2
0
Yep. It was victory on both sides. GOP gets their travel ban. Dems still ensure it isn't a blanket ban against travelers from the specific countries. I'm more interested in how the case will be argued by both sides in OCT. Oh by the way, the Trump Admin and appropriate agencies should've been spending the last 6 months improving the vetting system. I mean, they have been working on the issues with the vetting system right? Right?
(2)
(0)
MAJ James Woods
Capt Dwayne Conyers - Too bad the most recent list of terror attacks in the last few years, none of them came from any of the countries on Trump's list. So much for that idea.
(1)
(0)
SSgt Gary Andrews
To hear Trump tell it.......this was a huge win for him. It seems the part he won.....he won. And the part he lost, he won too. Go figure......
(2)
(0)
MAJ James Woods
SSgt Gary Andrews - Yep. The only part he heard was Supreme Court reinstated his EO Travel Ban. He ignored the words "compromised", "parts of", "unofficial decision", and "October".
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
The wheels of justice turn slowly while the events of the day speed by with frightening regularity. Well, that's the nature of living in an open society. It's dangerous. Inasmuch as people are being shielded from events in Europe, we need to import our own troubles so that people can learn... the hard way.
(2)
(0)
(0)
(0)
SSgt Gary Andrews
I can appreciate where you are coming from, Doc......a wall to keep people out is different from a wall to keep people in. But they are both just a wall......more of a symbol than anything else. Just as people who were determined to get out, found a way.......people that are determined to get in, will find a way. My point was.....Reagan was not in favor of walls, be they foreign walls or our walls......Trump is. Same party....different philosophy.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
Too many at re ignoring the word "PARTS" The parts of the EO that they did not revive means that at least part of the 9th ruling is LIKLEY to remain valid and seem to validate standing
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google