Posted on Oct 13, 2019
11
11
0
Hmmm... So, the ATF has been "interpreting" the definition of a receiver as it pertains to AR style firearms all wrong for decades. I wonder how this will go in the future?
The ATF's Definition of an AR-15 Lower as a 'Firearm' Is In Serious Trouble - The Truth About...
Posted from thetruthaboutguns.com
ATF
Firearms and Guns
Firearms Sales
Weapons
Collecting Guns
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 5
5
5
0
I've never understood why the lower is considered a "firearm" and is the only part of the weapon that is tracked, regulated, and has a serial number. The lower by itself is harmless, unless I pick it up and whack someone on their noggin' with it.
(5)
(0)
TSgt David L.
MSgt Steven Holt, NRP, CCEMT-P - I agree and always have thought that. Since the upper actually holds the bolt I guess that should have the serial number by the definition. I'm curious how this will end.
(3)
(0)
4
4
0
4
4
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google