Posted on Jun 30, 2017
The Glock 19 MHS Finally Unveiled–And Why the Army Went SIG
2.52K
6
6
2
2
0
My first thought is what really lousy tiny thumb safety that is. They probably did the least necessary to meet the MHS specs for it as it's unneeded, safety wise.
The Glock 19 MHS Finally Unveiled–And Why the Army Went SIG
Posted from gunsamerica.comPosted in these groups: 
Handguns and Pistols
DoD
Handguns and Pistols DoD
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
1
1
0
1
1
0
I have carried both the Glock and Sig as a police officer and I would take the Sig any day of the week. Glock makes great weapons and I still carry a Glock for off duty/ back up because they are small and light.
The reason why they lost is because Sig came in like $100 million less on their bid, plus they offered a full size and compact frame with each serial numbered trigger group... more bang for less buck.
The reason why they lost is because Sig came in like $100 million less on their bid, plus they offered a full size and compact frame with each serial numbered trigger group... more bang for less buck.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google