Responses: 4
If Elizabeth Warren were running she would be getting the same support. Despite the authors feelings, his authenticity doesn't derive from his less than perfect fitting suits or that every now and then his hair gets messed up and he;s not quick to fix it. It derives from the fact that he has been preaching the same message for decades. He is authentic, and that's simply not a claim Clinton can make with a straight face. Clinton changes her tune anytime the political winds shift and she's taken a lot of money from the Banks and Wall Street. She can not be my candidate any more than Cruz or Rubio could be my candidate.
(1)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
SSG (Join to see) - Staff; Like him or loathe him, you do have to admit that Mr. Saunders actually means what he says. Whether what he says is achievable is something else entirely. IF it were achievable, there is a likelihood that it would be a "Good Thing" (if properly managed). Whether it would be properly managed is something else entirely.
(0)
(0)
Great Article and Great Perspective about the Under 30 Crowd. Makes Sense.
(1)
(0)
It's an interesting take, I guess, but I don't see any substance at all to its contents. If the contention is that Mrs. Clinton is inauthentic because of her gender, they're apparently unaware of Mrs. Warren, whom the younger generation would support without any issue. People don't trust Secretary Clinton because she's untrustworthy; it's really that simple.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next