Avatar feed
Responses: 3
PO3 John Jeter
2
2
0
Respectfully,
Putting all else aside consider this; To equal the daily capacity of this pipeline, you would need a train 2.25 miles long (using standard size tank cars). Over the road tanker trucks? You would need 1,975 trucks. That gives you some idea why a pipeline is the best option. There are 72,000 miles of crude pipelines in the US out of 2.4 million miles of pipelines transporting various products. A significant portion of those lines are from WW II and Cold War era, yet they are still giving good service. With newer technology and improved materials, modern pipelines are less likely than ever to have spills or problem.
I will point out one thing more. This pipeline is being laid at a depth of 90 feet in an already certified pipeline corridor. This was done in case there was any leak, it would occur below the level of the river bed. This precaution exceeds federal requirements and was done voluntarily by the builders.
(2)
Comment
(0)
LTC Self Employed
LTC (Join to see)
8 y
Thank you for your specifics on that and with the environment understand is all the CO2 being generated by all those trucks and trains and the chances of spillage from those alternate and any fishing ways of transporting it but you have the environmentalists don't complain about the CO2 being given off by reservoirs to to rotting vegetation and it's not subject to a carbon tax.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC George Smith
1
1
0
this is a travesty ... there are hundreds of pipelined... all they had to do, was to parallel an existing line ... it's not "Rocket Surgery ot Brain Science."...
(1)
Comment
(0)
PO3 John Jeter
PO3 John Jeter
8 y
That's what they are doing more or less with the current route. They are using an already certified pipeline corridor determined to be geologically stable, easily accessible for maintenance and repairs, and a low population concentration.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close