Posted on Jul 28, 2017
Using cheap magnet, hacker beats protections on a "smart" handgun. - BBC News
2.14K
28
11
11
11
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel Pretty sure that critics of this gun said this could/would happen when it was first introduced. The only way to make a real "smart" handgun would be biometric identification on it. At which point it wouldn't be cost-effective for the market.
(5)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
PFC (Join to see) - just waiting for the Sig now. Until Glock tries to sue to block it...lol!!!
(1)
(0)
PFC (Join to see)
SSgt (Join to see) - I for one am glad. Many of my friends are Glocktards it gives me great pleasure as much as I love them to say in your face LOL
(1)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
SSgt (Join to see) - "Joseph Steinberg writes that "biometrics take time to process and are often inaccurate" - Note that 'inaccurate' is the key word here, not cost. He also wrote about the hackability(sp?) in the same article.
Steinberg Joseph (May 4, 2014). "Forbes: Why You Should Be Concerned About The New 'Smart Guns' (Whether You Love Or Hate Guns)". Forbes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/josephsteinberg/2014/05/04/smartguns/2/#6a [login to see]
Steinberg Joseph (May 4, 2014). "Forbes: Why You Should Be Concerned About The New 'Smart Guns' (Whether You Love Or Hate Guns)". Forbes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/josephsteinberg/2014/05/04/smartguns/2/#6a [login to see]
(2)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
SSG Robert Webster - Oh yeah. That was another one of their concerns (the initial critics). Will someone with traits similar to you be able to access your firearm? I wouldn't think the biometrics on a firearm to be super sensitive like retina scans, right?
(1)
(0)
If you build a better mousetrap, all you end up with is smarter mice. And an empty trap.....
(2)
(0)
Read This Next